Armies of Chinese Stowaways entered Canada in early 1900’s


Jan‘s Advertisement
Video: What Adolf Hitler said about the Boers
I decided to look in Adolf Hitlers Mein Kampf (My Struggle) to see what he said about the Boers. Few know of his obsession with the Boers when he was a young man. In Mein Kampf I found many references which indicated that Hitler had a knowledge even of the black tribes that live in South Africa.


[Paul Fromm in Canada sent this. So this is the story of how the Chinese came to Canada. Essentially, it seems to me, everyone, everywhere is trying to get into white/western countries. In Africa they followed us down through Africa. Jan]

Armies of Chinese Stowaways entered Canada in early 1900’s

Ottawa appointed appointed B.C. Judge Dennis Murphy in 1910 to investigate alleged Chinese immigration frauds. His investigation and the information he uncovered are very relevant in 2020. Two ships that were used by stowaways are pictured above : The Empress of Japan and The Kumeric

The following were six fraudulent methods which Chinese used to enter Canada in the years 1904-10. Beside each are some of Justice Murphy’s findings:

(1) FRAUD METHOD #1 : CHINESE STOWED AWAY ON SHIPS: After the Head Tax was raised to $500 in 1904, legal Chinese immigration declined greatly. However, illegal Chinese labourer immigration increased greatly. He pointed to the case in August, 1910 of the ship called the Kumeric in which 53 stowaways were apprehended. One of the stowaways who had been caught in an earlier March, 1910 attempt, confessed that in that earlier March endeavour, twenty stowaways had landed successfully in Vancouver. Justice Murphy concluded: “…it is clear that the number of stowaways who have entered Canada in the past is only limited to the number who attempted that route….” (P.25) In other words, the number was probably very large. Some Canadian witnesses described the number of Chinese stowaways descending from ships as "armies of Chinese".

Chinese labourer stowaways used the three major passenger shipping lines (C.P.R. Lines, the Blue Funnel Lines and the Bank Line) as well as tramp steamers to get to Canada. Most of these ships had Chinese crews. In fact, the crews on the Blue Funnel and Bank Lines were almost all Chinese. Justice Murphy concluded that stowing away was “an organized scheme” and that crew members, particularly on the Blue Funnel and Bank Lines, were involved. (P.22) It is probable that they profited by aiding the stowaways in (a) getting aboard the ships, (b) obtaining food while on the ship and (c) getting safely off the ships. The Chinese took great advantage of the inadequate security at west coast Canadian ports.

For example, in Vancouver, only one government watchman was employed to guard a ship. A Secret Service man who investigated this issue, found that most of these men were of poor character. They were frequently intoxicated on their 12 hour night shifts (6PM to 6AM) or took long meal breaks and left the gangplank completely unguarded. At Union Bay on Vancouver Island, where the large Blue Funnel and Bank Lines ships, as well as small tramp steamers, re-fuelled with coal, stowaways could leave the ships with virtual impunity. No government watchman was present.

In Vancouver, no harbour patrol existed. Ships could arrive, report their arrival a day later, and, in the meantime, unload a cargo of stowaways. It was more difficult to get away with this in Victoria. (P.24) However, at the port of Nanaimo, no watchmen were employed (P.24) and entry was easy.

(2) FRAUD METHOD #2 : CHINESE CREWS PRETENDED TO BE RESIDENTS OF CANADA AND OBTAINED RE-ENTRY PERMITS : Members of Chinese crews (ranging from 80 to 120 on each of the large ships) went ashore, changed their attire, then went to Canadian government officials and pretended that they were residents of Canada. They asked for RE-ENTRY TO CANADA permits which would allow them to visit China and return within a year, as provided by Canada’s Immigration Act. Having obtained the permits, they changed their attire once more, re-boarded their ship and headed for China. Once back in China, they sold the permits at a good profit to people who wanted to go to Canada and avoid paying the $500 Head Tax. The only stumbling block was that the physical characteristics of the buyer had to resemble the physical characteristics of the vendor crew member. Those characteristics had been written on the re-entry certificate. by immigration officials in Vancouver. (This was before the age of passports.) Justice Murphy concluded that the number of Chinese entering Canada illegally in this way was probably few.

(3) FRAUD METHOD #3 : CHINESE RESIDENTS OF CANADA PRETENDED THEY WANTED TO MAKE A TRIP TO CHINA AND THEN RETURN TO CANADA. In reality, they had no intention of coming back to Canada. They wanted to sell the Re-ENTRY TO CANADA PERMIT in China. Once there, they sold the permit at a good profit to a Chinese labourer who wanted to come to Canada. Justice Murphy estimated that there was probably extensive abuse of this “Re-Entry” permit system. The permits did not have photographs on them. Identifying the ”re-entrants" consisted of matching a set of physical characteristics, recorded at the time of the labourer’s first entry into Canada, with the characteristics of the labourer holding the re-entry certificate. This was a haphazard system and open to abuse.

(4) FRAUD METHOD #4 : CHINESE INFILTRATED CANADA’S IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM BY GETTING JOBS AS INTERPRETERS. In the case of ships coming to Vancouver, YIP ON, the Chinese interpreter who lived in Vancouver, went to Victoria with a White officer, met the ship and boarded it. On the way back to Vancouver, YIP ON had the opportunity to talk to re-entering labourers, in a language his White companion did not understand and to make “arrangements” (getting bribes) from them so that they could enter Canada successfully. YIP ON had the job of calling out the physical characteristics of the re-entrant to a Canadian immigration officer and could easily omit characteristics which did not apply. As Justice Murphy notes, Yip On was “often seen in the Government office at night copying physical descriptions from the books, particularly just before Oriental boats were scheduled to arrive” in Vancouver. (P.26) He was an obvious crook. Yip On and the former interpreter (Yip On’s brother Charley Yip Yen, who had returned to China), both had been given positions of trust, but both betrayed the trust. A lengthy investigation resulted in Yip On’s suspension from his position on September 16, 1910 and deportation of a number of “Passport Men Merchants” he was responsible for bringing in. It later resulted in his disappearance from Canada—probably because he feared criminal prosecution for the fraud he had committed.

(5) FRAUD METHOD #5 : ENTRY AS HEAD TAX EXEMPT MERCHANTS’ WIVES, SONS AND DAUGHTERS: Immigration law allowed a merchant to bring in his wife, sons and daughters and not have to pay the HEAD TAX on them. Chinese used the title "Merchant" to import the sons of non-blood-related Chinese. They would charge other Chinese a fee to take that person’s son to Canada. The number of exempt “sons” brought into B.C. increased from 16 in 1904 to 462 in 1910—an indication that word had spread on how Chinese could evade the Head Tax on "Sons". The total of “exempts” in B.C. alone in 1910 was 497. In the period, 1904 to 1910, a total of 1503 exempted “sons” entered Canada. In other words, "Sons" had become merchandise. The real "business" that some "Merchants" were involved in was "trafficking"– making money on cheating Canada out of the Head Tax on "sons". The federal government tried to prevent cheating by interviewing the “sons” and “father” separately to detect discrepancies in stories, but the interpreter Yip On was involved in the story-translations. In Justice Murphy’s view, Yip On undoubtedly tried to disguise the cheating—in return for a fee from the people involved. The Chinese documentation that was provided about birth dates and parents was regarded as very unreliable.

(6) FRAUD METHOD #6 : CHINESE PRETENDED TO BE MERCHANTS : There were two problems with the immigration law. One was that the word “merchant” was not defined in the act. In Justice Murphy’s words, “Chinese could…enter Canada as merchants without being merchants in the sense intended by Parliament”. (P.30) Around 400 did so from 1904 to 1910— All "Merchants" had to do was put some money into a business in China to familiarize themselves with the business. They did not have to bring a minimum amount of money to invest in Canada and they did not have to engage in business in Canada. Many of these “merchants” were mere employees of the business or had nothing to do with the business. In 1910, there were 528 Chinese firms with 2561 members registered in B.C.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Judge Murphy did not state the total number of Chinese who defrauded Canada but it was probably well into the thousands, a significant percentage of the total number of Chinese in Canada at the time. It was definitely high enough to warn Ottawa that Chinese frauds were a serious problem.

JUSTICE MURPHY’S RECOMMENDATIONS :

(A)The most important one was that an agreement be negotiated with the Government of China to restrict Chinese immigration to Canada to a limited number per year. This agreement would have been similar to the agreement Canada negotiated with Japan. Justice Murphy also recommended that watchman security be significantly tightened to prevent the landing of stowaways, particularly at the refueling terminal of Union Bay which Justice Murphy described as “practically a free port for the entrance of Chinese and for smuggling opium into Canada”. (P.49)

(B) He stated that the “Exempt” classifications for Merchants and for Merchants’ families, particularly for sons, were being abused. The Merchants’ category had to be strictly controlled and the Merchants’ Sons’ category should be either abolished or that the sons’ age should be lowered to 12. He also recommended that because the Chinese were virtually “An Empire Within An Empire” on Canada’s west coast, that the position of Chinese Interpreter would be better served by a white person who had lived in China (P.53) (and, it is assumed, knew the relevant Chinese dialects). Penalties for disobeying immigration laws had to be more severe, and power should be taken to deport anyone who had entered Canada by fraud. — Dan Murray, www.ImmigrationWatchCanada.org

For more details, see the following :

https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/immigration/immigration-records/immigrants-china-1885-1949/Pages/introduction.aspx

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/chinese-descendants-to-receive-compensation-for-head-tax-1.551028

https://nationalpost.com/news/covid-19-pandemic-wuhan-institute-of-virology-ebola-national-microbiology-laboratory



Jan‘s Advertisement
Wie is ons? Boere of Afrikaners? Antwoord van Dr Mike Du Toit
Ek het iemand gehad wat aan my geskryf het oor die onderwerp van Boere teenoor Afrikaners. Ek het besluit om Dr. Mike Du Toit te nader, wat die leier van die Boeremag was en ‘n professionele akademikus is wat baie goed ingelig is oor ons geskiedenis, om hierdie vraag te beantwoord. Dr. Du Toit weet nie net van ons geskiedenis in Suid-Afrika nie, maar ook van ons geskiedenis in Europa. Hier is sy antwoord.

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar