Video: Tom Metzger & Jan: Discuss: Early Christians, Hitler, Napoleon & Global White Revolution


Right-Click here to download the Video

Tom and I begin by discussing the latest on Trump and the Jews and how the Jews are stabbing Trump in the back.

We discuss early Christians and the bloody wars that were caused by Christianity where Christians killed Christians by the million in Europe; especially the Thirty Years war where 8 million White Christians killed each other.

We discuss the Crusades and the disasters such as the terrible Children’s Crusade.

We discuss our different views on Napoleon and Hitler. We discuss the Roman Empire and the old Germanic tribes. Why did Hitler use Rome as his model for the Germans and not focus on the old Germanic tribes?

Tom says that whites should kill leaders who lead them to war!

Tom says we need more men like Franklin who led the expedition to find the North West Passage. We need men who are explorers and builders.

We discuss the modern pussified white males and why the system should break or collapse and why whites should work to BREAK THE SYSTEM. We discuss why WORSE is BETTER.

I mention that in Africa, whites made difficult things look easy. Blacks believe things were easy. But whites EVERYWHERE make difficult things look easy.

Tom ends by saying: Viva La Revolution!

14 thoughts on “Video: Tom Metzger & Jan: Discuss: Early Christians, Hitler, Napoleon & Global White Revolution

  • 2nd August 2018 at 5:10 am

    Chapter XV of Gibbon does indeed mention circumcision. Here’s an online extract from an expurgated edition—

    The history of the church of Jerusalem affords a lively proof of the necessity of those precautions, and of the deep impression which the Jewish religion had made on the minds of its sectaries. The first fifteen bishops of Jerusalem were all circumcised Jews; and the congregation over which they presided united the law of Moses with the doctrine of Christ. 17 It was natural that the primitive tradition of a church which was founded only forty days after the death of Christ, and was governed almost as many years under the immediate inspection of his apostle, should be received as the standard of orthodoxy. The distant churches very frequently appealed to the authority of their venerable Parent, and relieved her distresses by a liberal contribution of alms. But when numerous and opulent societies were established in the great cities of the empire, in Antioch, Alexandria, Ephesus, Corinth, and Rome, the reverence which Jerusalem had inspired to all the Christian colonies insensibly diminished. 18b The Jewish converts, or, as they were afterwards called, the Nazarenes, who had laid the foundations of the church, soon found themselves overwhelmed by the increasing multitudes, that from all the various religions of polytheism enlisted under the banner of Christ: and the Gentiles, who, with the approbation of their peculiar apostle, had rejected the intolerable weight of the Mosaic ceremonies, at length refused to their more scrupulous brethren the same toleration which at first they had humbly solicited for their own practice…

    I’ve left in extra stuff; I don’t find Gibbon as clear as many people claim.

  • 29th July 2018 at 5:04 am

    Tom lost his mind thinking GERMANY started an could have avoided WW2 and it need check out a book call white book of the events leading up to WW2 and everything uncle Adolf did trying to save GERMANY and all European minus (((COMMUNIST))). But it takes a lot to clear out all the jewish lies we learned in school

    • 31st July 2018 at 11:46 am

      Well as you can see, on this topic Tom and I differ. I don’t believe Germany could have escaped WW2. You can see this clearly in the Polish stuff.

      Britain and France declared war based on the attack on Poland. What you don’t get told is that 54-58,000 German civilians were being murdered in Poland at the instigation of the Jews.

      There is much more, like Russia’s moves as well as what JFK’s dad said. There was a global move to put Hitler in a trap from which he would not escape. You would have noticed them saying that it was unconditional surrender all the way. The British from the beginning showed no desire to surrender ever. Churchill himself made it clear that he would fight the war from Canada if he needed to.

  • 27th July 2018 at 8:38 am

    I have to mention this point you brought up regarding Hitler’s invasion of Poland. Jan, you are correct regarding the slaughter of German’s living in Poland especially Danzig, which was under going ethnic cleansing by the Poles after they got assurance from Britain and France. This is the prime reason Hitler invaded Poland to come to the aid of his people, and the territory’s stolen from Germany in 1919. I have a rare book on the subject which confirms the atrocities done by the Poles during the 1939 period. The book is called,”Polish acts of atrocity against the German minority in Poland”. the book’s documentary evidence was complied by Hans Schadewaldt and published by the German Foreign Office 1940. This is a hidden jewel of lost history.

  • 27th July 2018 at 8:05 am

    Metzger sounds a bit amateur in his understanding of certain historical events, namely Hitler’s 16 point peace plan for Poland. And if he cares about the working class, surely he’d understand Hitler caring about the million Germans living in Poland post WWI who were being tortured and killed.

    • 31st July 2018 at 11:56 am

      Thanks for your info. I was not sure of the total population of Germans in Poland. I see you say that there were a million. Thanks.

      I am fully aware that as many as 58,000 of them were being tortured and killed. I regard it as Hitler’s 911.

  • 27th July 2018 at 7:45 am

    Metzger is a genuine guy,but he is a bit confused on some historical events

    • 27th July 2018 at 9:31 am

      Indeed…. I too was surprised on how many gaps there were in Metzger’s knowledge, especially regarding Hitler’s plans to invade Russia. Hitler only became alarmed with Russia only when they started breaking all the non aggression pacts with the Baltic nations, Hitler knew sooner or later that Germany was next on Stalin’s invasion plans to invade the west.

      • 28th July 2018 at 12:03 pm

        It gets even better as a Scandinavian discovered in document S-25:
        Hitler got notice (by intercepting an enemy plane) of the CHURCHILL-STALIN treaty, whose negotiations started in spring 1939. It was about a 4-front war against Germany, including all dates.

        This changes everything!!!

        • 31st July 2018 at 11:49 am

          Thanks for this. I was unaware of it.

          Suvorov himself explains how Stalin agreed to attack Poland on the same day as Germany and then says, oops, I’m not ready; waits 17 days and then only attacks!

          So Hitler comes out looking like the aggressor! Suvorov says this is clearly a TRICK!

    • 27th July 2018 at 6:14 pm

      From a purely historical perspective, Im wondering what primary historical sources used to suggest early Christianity was supportive of Judiasm?? Its correct some early Judiazers tried to introduce circumcision and other Jewish rituals into the early church.

      However they sharply got corrected by the early church, then several years later an entire letter sent out to all the churches that Jewish festivals, circumcision and other Jewish practices were meaningless.

      The Jewish Rabbis went around trying to kill the Christians. Saying a man was God was utter BLASPHEMY and punishable by death in Jewish laws. Then teaching that the Jews killed their own Messiah sent the Jewish Rabbis crazy with rage.

      Time and time again the Jews kept stoning, harassing and killing the early church members for rejecting sacred Jewish religious laws.

      I hardly ever disagree with stuff here, however the stuff about Christianity being kosher is blatantly historically wrong according to the primary sources.

      The kosher clowns that tried to make Christianity Kosher were “sharply rebuked” by the first Christian council in Jerusalem. (Paul and James rebuking Peter PUBLICLY)

      Im not a Christian but an ancient historian that primarily focused on Roman military/politics and the rise of Christianity. When studying Ancient History EVERY Marxist and Jew hated my guts…

      • 31st July 2018 at 11:54 am

        In Gibbons’ decline and fall of Rome, I read about the early Christians. Gibbons tells you that they circumcised themselves and even ran to synagogues when they were in trouble. And that’s just a tiny portion of what I read. If you really want to know about the early Christians you’ll find stacks of detail in Gibbons’ mammoth work on the fall of Rome. The early Christians were actually JEWS – real JEWS. Don’t fall for the myths about early Christianity. Early Christians were like communists too – real troublemakers. There’s nothing redeeming about the early Christians.

        • 2nd August 2018 at 9:16 am

          Gibbons DRE was one of my text books, its not a primary source. I dont really care, its just stuff to divide the whites. The primary historical records do not support a lot of Gibbons work. Gibbons has been found wrong about the sacking of Rome etc. JB Bury and Averil Cameron are better modern sources than Gibbons.

          (did you know the Germans didnt really sack Rome in the way Gibbons and many believe. It was more of a political stunt than a typical sacking of the day)

          The last few years Macquarie Ancient History department has put less and less weight on Gibbons as an authority. This was one of the professors that played a part in my curriculum, a WASP that was expelled because he said blacks have an average IQ of 70 and he wanted Australia to be 90% white on national Television.

          The early church fathers, apostolic letters, gospel records and some other secular sources are primary historical sources. We have roman letters clearly differentiating between Jews and Christians, though at first they thought they were the same but that ended when the Jews kept persecuting.

          If you want to check out the other side to the story like I did with Hitler and the Nazis, then check out a conference “bethinking” I have a lot more to say about the early church that EVERYONE gets wrong but honestly I dont feel like arguing. Another good book is the “New Testament Documents” by NT Wright, who was Bart Ehrman’s professor.

          Bart Ehrman is the most famous atheist critic of the Christian Scriptures. His professor taught him everything he knows and is the most famous defender of the Christian Scriptures. They have the same information/facts yet they interpret them differently based on their PRESUPPOSITIONS and biases.

          In my 1st history lesson I was taught that everyone is biased regarding history but the aim is to minimize the bias but NEVER to completely remove it.


Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar