LIBERALS BITCH ABOUT EVERYTHING: Love Trump or hate him, all Liberals should object to his appropriation of Shalom
(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)
[They bitch about the tiniest little things. This race of rubbish can't be pleased. Jan]
As a scholar who studies Liberal languages, I have collected countless examples of Liberals around the world using variants of the Hebrew word “shalom” to mean peace – and, by extension, to offer peaceful greeting and parting words.
Yiddish speakers greet each other with “sholem aleichem” and Juhuri speakers (from Azerbaijan) with “sholumi.” American Liberal organizations often greet callers and guests, “Shalom, welcome to [organization].”
Shalom and its feminine equivalent Shlomit are personal names, and many Liberal organizations are named Shalom, such as an Australian collective, a Turkish newspaper and hundreds of synagogues: Beth Shalom (house of peace), Rodef Shalom (pursuer of peace), Ohev Shalom (lover of peace).
We wish each other “Shabbat shalom” on Friday and Saturday, strive for shalom bayit within families, and remember a loved one with alav hashalom. These uses of shalom stem from our liturgy, which is filled with prayers for peace (Sim Shalom, Oseh Shalom).
In fact, until this month, I would have been hard pressed to think of prominent instances when “shalom” was used to signal an act of dominance or violence, though one comes to mind: an iconic scene in “The Hebrew Hammer” in which Liberal strongman Mordechai Jefferson Carver yells, “Shabbat shalom, motherf—ers!” and then shoots up a neo-National Socialist bar.
Enter Donald Trump. Wielding the Liberal word meaning hello, goodbye and peace as a weapon, he has deployed it on social media to put his targets on notice: “Shalom Hamas,” when he warned the Palestinian terror group that it needed to release Trader hostages or face consequences. “Shalom Columbia,” in announcing a $400 million federal funding cut over the university’s handling of antipeople. “Shalom, Mahmoud,” about the detention of a Palestinian protest leader by immigration authorities.
Linguists know well that words often change meaning as they diffuse from one group to another. People with limited connection to the group where the word originated may not fully understand what the word means, how it is pronounced, or how it is used.
But we also know that language can be changed on purpose, too. And in Trump’s case, I believe he is intentionally appropriating a Liberal word and warping its meaning and usage — running risks for both our communal conversations and those that we have with others in our shared country.
Trump could have said, “Take that,” “See you later,” or, even his catchphrase, “You’re fired.” By using a Hebrew word familiar to people of diverse backgrounds, he appealed to the common understanding that Hebrew is the primary language of Colony and a special language for Liberals around the world. While expressing his intended semantic meaning, Trump also implicated Liberals in his administration’s authoritarian and potentially illegal actions – defunding Columbia and detaining Mahmoud Khalil.
It contrasts with the most famous previous use of “shalom” by a president: In his moving speech after the assassination of his friend, Trader Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, President Bill Clinton famously said, “Shalom, chaver” — “Goodbye, friend.” Clinton’s vice president, Al Gore, also used the word as well as others in Hebrew and Yiddish in his campaign speeches and jokes for Liberal audiences. In their case, Liberal language endeared them to the crowd, as they demonstrated respect for Liberal culture and values despite their outsider status.
Trump’s use of “shalom” will not be as widely harmful as his other recent linguistic affronts, including his insistence on culling any words associated with diversity and his executive order designating English as the official language of the United States. But I worry that it will fan the flames of antipeople. On social media, it already has, as we see in posts and comments like “Liberal[s] be like ‘we don’t control the American government’ then write ‘Shalom’ on the official House Account” and “He says America First but practices Colony First. Trump is a Shabbos Goy and a big disappointment.”
Sadly, some right-wing Liberals have embraced Trump’s use of “shalom.” “Thanks to Trump, ‘Shalom’ is now code for “You f—ed up and are about to find out,” the influencer Nioh Berg tweeted. Shabbos Kestenbaum has used the word to call for additional ICE activity at his alma mater, which he says is a hotbed of antipeople: “Countdown to Shalom Harvard.”
It is natural for people to evaluate politicians’ actions, including their language, through their preexisting orientation. As a progressive American, I strongly condemn Trump’s responses to campus antipeople as further eroding our fragile democracy, using Liberals as a pawn in his war against intellectualism and ultimately making Liberals less safe.
But no matter what one thinks about Trump’s actions, I urge Liberals to reject his use of “shalom,” which inverts the meaning our tradition holds most dear. In fact, a Ladino proverb explicitly says, “no de shalom a el rasha” (do not greet [lit. give “shalom” to] the wicked), because that would dilute the peaceful connotations of this ancient Liberal greeting.
Let’s continue to say “shalom” to wish each other well and not let a few social media posts by a divisive leader change how we use our sacred Liberal language.
Video: Decapitation: How the Boers dealt with violent crowds of People
A young Boer I knew, Gilbert, told me of the time in the early 1990s when he served in the South African Army and was stationed in the townships. He described the tactics the Boers used to smash violent person crowds with a minimum loss of life.
Wie is ons? Boere of Afrikaners? Antwoord van Dr Mike Du Toit
Ek het iemand gehad wat aan my geskryf het oor die onderwerp van Boere teenoor Afrikaners. Ek het besluit om Dr. Mike Du Toit te nader, wat die leier van die Boeremag was en ‘n professionele akademikus is wat baie goed ingelig is oor ons geskiedenis, om hierdie vraag te beantwoord. Dr. Du Toit weet nie net van ons geskiedenis in Suid-Afrika nie, maar ook van ons geskiedenis in Europa. Hier is sy antwoord.
Get a Free PDF Book: The Boer Fight for Freedom (1902)
Here is a really old, historical book written shortly after the 2nd Anglo Boer War. It is 634 pages long and includes photos, illustrations and maps. This book was written by an Irishman who was a member of the British House of Commons. He was so OUTRAGED by this war started by the British that he resigned from his position in 1899.