Pics: A History of the World Liberal Congress

by Carolyn Yeager, February 2017

IF U.S. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP CAN BE ATTACKED AS “HITLER” (called racist, hater, genocidal dictator) it’s because the WW2 propaganda lies about Hitler have never undergone rational discussion in the general public, been treated with objectivity, and in so doing been discredited. Instead, even those on the political right, the “conservatives”, nationalists and identity groups and individuals in general have quietly caved in to the “Story” narrative for all these years.

The crass lies, false rumors and wartime fake intelligence reports continue to be spread via the (((media))), (((entertainment outlets))), (((academia))) and (((publishers of history books))) with minimum resistance. This cowardice in standing up against this trash-talk is responsible for the situation we’re in now in the U.S. and Europe – with an historically ignorant, brainwashed population convinced that to protect and strengthen one’s nation, to show preference for those residing within your own national borders in the same way you show preference to your own family members over strangers, the same way you safeguard your home against intruders, is wrong, even evil, because it’s “what Hitler did.” And look what happened there.

We can’t have it both ways. We can’t join in the repudiation of Hitler, the world’s most famous nationalist, and successfully fight against the repudiation of Trump on the same grounds.

For this reason, I hope this post will be instructive to remind all my “conservative” friends and fellow-travelers just how this propaganda was created by the enemies of the race. Adolf Hitler was not the enemy, as so many People today believe he was. There is no bigger enemy to our interests, then and now, than the World Liberal Congress (WJC), currently headed by Estee Lauder cosmetics heir, billionaire Ronald Lauder. That’s why I am continuing to write about this organization.

In this post, I have selected the information from a page at heretical.com by Udo Walendy, German author and historian born in Berlin in 1927 (and still living). The sections in boldface indicated by Walendy are direct quotes with page numbers from the World Liberal Congress document Unity in Dispersion, a History of the WJC. My own comments are in dark red. I have underlined words and sentences I believe are most worthy of special consideration by the reader. My intention is to show the instrumentality of the WJC in crafting, propagating and upholding the Story Myth, or the ‘Lie of the Gas Chambers’ in order to inflict great and lasting harm on the German people and nation. I also want to bring attention to the WJC’s efforts to stamp a “national character” onto world Liberals (even though they are dispersed into other nations and will continue to be), while at the same time working for the success of a geographical nation state for Liberals, ie. Colony. This particular type of dual-citizenship is a special status enjoyed by no other people in the world. In both of these areas, the World Liberal Congress has from the beginning worked against our interests – the interests of European-derived peoples.

A History of the World Liberal Congress and particularly, the Liberal influence on the Roosevelt Presidency and the Origins of WWII

Udo Walendy

In order to emphasize the documentary character of this publication, we left largely without commentary our examination of the very important document on the World Liberal Congress (Unity in Dispersion, a History of the WJC, published in New York in 1948.

The WJC is a permanent world organization.

At the First Nationalist Congress in Basle in 1897, two different objectives were set:

1. The creation of a Liberal state in Palestine;
2. Joint efforts to improve the living conditions of Liberals* living in the “Diaspora,” i.e. outside Palestine.

[*Liberals were concentrated in Eastern Europe and Russia, mostly a poor, ignorant and superstitious people with little to commend themselves to the Western world.]

A Nationalist Conference held in Carlsbad [Bohemia] in 1922 determined that a Liberal world organization should be created to deal with world politics.

In 1932 the first preparatory conference of the WJC convened in Geneva. Preconditions had already been fulfilled during WWI – predominately US Liberals had assumed leadership of worldwide Liberal interests in 1919 in Versailles.

… a great number of Liberal delegations from many lands had found their way to the French capital.

On March 24, 1919, a Comite des Delegations Juives aupres de la Conference de la Paix (Conference of Liberal Delegations at the Peace Conference) was formed. The World Nationalist Organization and the B’nai B’rith were also represented on the Comite. The Comite des Delegations Juives thus claimed to be the spokesmen of over ten million Liberals. (p 26)

At Versailles, they were successful in gaining:

a) The protection of the rights of minorities;

b) Influence on international law to restrict the sovereignty of a state.

Although Poland never complied with the above, nor did Czechoslovakia or Lithuania. It was aimed at Germany.

After the peace conference ended, the committee decided to continue as a permanent panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Leo Motzkin. It exercised influence at International Minority Congresses and at the League of Nations.

Dr. Nahum Goldmann convened the first preparative World Liberal Conference in Geneva on behalf of the American Liberal Congress on 14-17 August 1932. The Central Association of German Nationals of Liberal Faith and a number of other organizations refused to participate in this conference. [Goldman was born in the Russian Empire, grew up in Germany and in 1935 immigrated to the U.S.]

The purpose of the WJC was defined by Goldmann as follows:

‘It is to establish the permanent address of the Liberal people; amidst the fragmentation and atomization of Liberal life and of the Liberal community; it is to establish a real, legitimate, collective representation of Liberals which will be entitled to speak in the name of the 16 million Liberals to the nations and governments of the world, as well as to the Liberals themselves.’ (p 33) [In other words, it was a move to leverage scattered Liberals into a single power bloc, a “nation” for all practical purposes, but living within other nations (therefore the need for minority rights)].

The Conference elected an Executive Committee, in which Dr. Stephen Wise and Dr. Nahum Goldmann (shown at left in 1942 -Goldmann on left) were entrusted with leading positions. During 5-8 September 1933 and 20-23 August 1934 the second and third preparative conferences convened. In the meantime, the rise to power of National Socialism had become the crucial subject at these conferences.

The official founding of the WJC took place in August 1936 in Geneva, Switzerland with 180 delegates from 32 countries in attendance, but none from Germany or the Soviet Union. [The vast majority of delegates came from 2 countries: the United States (75) and Poland (60) Several countries were represented with only one delegate.] Nahum Goldman announced that the existing sovereignty of nations should be considered obsolete. The League of Nations should be reinforced to safeguard the interests of the weaker groups in the world.

‘Millions of Liberals in eastern Europe are being economically expropriated, politically disenfranchised, and physically terrorized in the name of the supremacy of the state and of the dominant nation’ (p 49). [Liberals are powerless in strong and dominant nations.]

‘Where the equal rights of a Liberal community are affected, we are no longer concerned with a regional Liberal question, but with the Liberal question, with a common, worldwide Liberal interest. The surrender of the Liberals’ equality of rights in any country would mean the surrender of their equality of rights throughout the world. [Because Liberals exist in every country yet want to be seen as “a single nation”, the loss of rights in one country affects Liberals everywhere, the reasoning goes. Behold the “International Liberal”]

‘Dr. Goldman concluded by linking the Liberal fate with that of humanity itself. We know quite well, he said, that we cannot by ourselves succeed in repelling the attack launched by the Germans upon our right to exist. We can only join forces with the many others in the world who in their own interest must fight against this world menace’ (pp 50-51). [We are familiar with the Liberal’s expropriation of the word “humanity” in connection with the “Story” theme.]

In this founding conference, Dr. Goldmann became President of the Administrative Committee and Dr. Stephen Wise became President of the Executive Committee. Goldmann sought to integrate the Liberal destiny with that of the whole of mankind, which he said “has to fight against this world menace in her own interest – to defend against an aggression, which was started by Germany.” [Liberals must unite the whole of mankind against Germany] It was emphasized that “fighting against Hitlerism is one of the most important tasks” and that “anti-People must be branded an international crime” [this was the Bolshevik position], that “propaganda is at present one of the main instruments of foreign politics,” and that a boycott as well as a confidential international intelligence service were required to be used as political weapons. (pp 56-57)

Let’s list those separately:

• Fighting against Hitlerism is one of most important tasks;
• Anti-People must become an international crime;
• Propaganda is a main instrument of foreign policy;
• Boycott and secret intelligence service used as political weapons.

When World War Two erupted, the WJC headquarters were moved to Paris, and in July 1940, to New York City. The Geneva office continued to exist under the management of Dr. Gerhard Riegner and Dr. Abraham Silberschein, maintaining contact with German-occupied countries and the International Red Cross.

Institute of Liberal Affairs

In 1941, the “Institute of Liberal Affairs” was founded as a section of the WJC, provided with a staff of scientists, and assigned the task of gathering information from all parts of the world concerning Liberal affairs with the aim of submitting a Liberal peace program to the peace conference at the end of hostilities. The Institute did not consider the period from 1919 to 1939 as “peacetime,” but as an “armistice” or at most a “post-war situation” (pp. 136-137). As early as 1942, the “punishment of war crimes” had become a central question, and the necessity was stressed that a basis should be created on which crimes could be punished retroactively as from 1933.

In June 1942 in NYC, 300 delegates attended a meeting of the Advisory Staff for European Liberal Matters, which was coordinated with the WJC. Here, a demand was made for the first time that no peace negotiation should ever be carried out without representatives of the WJC participating. (p 131)

The Institute of Liberal Affairs entertained close relations with the Geneva office and the British Section of the WJC in London. The British Section had built up a research staff of over thirty experts, allowing the Institute to compile a remarkable amount of material, including thousands of documents, press reports, papers, projects, drafts and manuscripts ready for printing. Some of the most important publications are:

• Zorach Warhaftig, Starvation over Europe (1943);
• (no authors named), Liberals in National Socialist Europe, Where Shall They Go? (1941);
• Hitler’s Ten Year War on the Liberals (1943) (this book made a tremendous impression on the Allied governments and served as a basic textbook at the Nuremberg Military Tribunal);
• Jacob Robinson, Unfinished Victory (1946);
• Zorach Warhaftig, Uprooted (1946);
• Jacob Lestschinsky, Balance Sheet of Extermination.

The most important paper transmitted to the American authorities was “The Conspiracy against the Liberal People,” the main chapters of which were headed:

I. The Originally Conceived Plan of Extermination of the Liberal People

II. The Different Stages of the Crime Against the Liberal People

III. The Responsibility of Individuals and Organizations (translated from the German original).

During 26-30 November 1944 the ‘War Emergency Committee’ of the WJC convened in Atlantic City, USA, at which 269 delegates coming from forty countries attended, and for which the Institute of Liberal Affairs had compiled the most essential papers to be discussed, such as:

1. The Liberal migration on the European continent to be expected as a result of the war. The emigration of Liberals from Europe to other parts of the world, including mass settlement in Palestine, were discussed, along with the problems of the Liberals who could not be repatriated (p. 146).
2. The claims and properties of Liberals who have remained without heirs should not be assigned to the respective state – as is general practice – but to the Liberal Representative Organization. [Again, separating Liberals from the states in which they live while at the same time demanding they have full rights of citizens in those states.]
3. Wiedergutmachung and reparations¹ as well as the participation of Liberal representatives in the meetings of large international panels. [See footnote 1]
4. Liberal claims for future peace settlements and participation therein.

‘In December, 1944, Dr. Kubiwutzki sailed on a mission to the European continent, being the first Liberal emissary from overseas to arrive in Belgium and Switzerland since the outbreak of hostilities, and one of the first to visit France. ‘Direct contact between the British Section and the continent of Europe began in November, 1944’ (pp. 132-133).

St James Conference

The St. James Conference in London in January 1942, where eight exile governments and the National Committee of ‘Free France’ convened for a “discussion on German war crimes.”

‘On January 13, 1942, the Conference issued a declaration branding the reign of terror instituted by Germany in occupied countries, the mass expulsions, the execution of hostages, and the massacres. Not one reference was made to the crimes against the Liberals’ (p. 160). [The Liberals are feeling slighted.]

‘On February 18 the [WJ]Congress asked for a specific statement with reference to the “many and special crimes against the Liberals.” It was not until almost three months later that General Wladyslaw Sikorski, President of the Conference, finally replied that a specific reference to the sufferings endured by the Liberals “might be equivalent to an implicit recognition of the racial theories which we all reject”’ (pp. 161, 261-262). [Touche. Liberals are opposed to racial theories except when used to make themselves special. Sikorski died in a mysterious airplane crash in July 1943.]

Thereupon the British section of the WJC organized on 29 June 1942 its own ‘Conference of the Press of the Free World,’ where the “Facts of a Systematic Extermination of European Liberals” were announced. What “facts” these were is not revealed in the conference minutes.

There were, however, immediate reactions in Britain and abroad. The British Broadcasting Corporation transmitted – for the first time – pertaining news, and there were mass demonstrations in the United States which addressed war crimes and the rescue of European Liberals. It was to one of these meetings (Madison Square Gardens, 21 July 1942) that British Prime Minister Winston Churchill sent the following message:

‘The Liberals were Hitler’s first victims, and ever since they have been in the forefront of resistance to National Socialist aggression’ (p.161).

The WJC commented that “This sentence [of Churchill’s] rightly characterized the Liberals of whatever nationality as an allied people of the United Nations” (p. 240).

At the World Liberal Congress in NYC, the then President of this conference, Dr. Chaim Weizmann, stated on 3 December 1942:

‘We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Liberals… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Liberals. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Liberals living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.’² [Nationalist leaders portrayed themselves in the forefront leading the Gentiles in the war against their arch-enemy – Nationalism. They intended to be major beneficiaries of the war.]

The Roosevelt Administration

The present documentation does not contain all the necessary details that are required for historical research to give us an objective judgment of events. It is a presentation on Liberals as seen by Liberals. Dr. Nahum Goldmann speaking off the record on President Roosevelt:

‘This weakness of the President frequently results in failure on the part of the House to report all the facts to the Senate and the Congress; its description of the prevailing situation is not always absolutely correct and in conformity with the truth…

‘When I lived in America, I learned that Liberal personalities – most of them rich donors for the parties – had easy access to the President. They used to contact him over the head of the Foreign Secretary [Sec. of State] and the representative at the United Nations and other officials. They were often in a position to alter the entire political line by a single telephone conversation…

‘Stephen Wise… occupied a unique position not only within American Liberals, but also generally in America…. He was a close friend of Wilson… he was also an intimate friend of Roosevelt and had permanent access to him, a factor which naturally affected his relations to other members of the American Administration… ’

‘The President’s car stopped in front of the verandah, and before we could exchange greetings, Roosevelt remarked: “How interesting! Sam Rosenman, Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldmann are sitting there discussing what order they should give to the President of the United States. Just imagine what amount of money the National Socialists would pay to obtain a photo of this scene.”

‘We began to stammer to the effect that there was an urgent message from Europe to be discussed by us, which Rosenman would submit to him on Monday. Roosevelt dismissed him with the words: “This is quite all right. On Monday I shall hear from Sam what I have to do,” and he drove on.’³

Nor is it unimportant to know that Samuel Untermeyer, who called for a “holy war” against Germany in 1933,

‘was so close to Roosevelt that his nephew Lawrence Steinhardt became the new US ambassador in Moscow in the fall of 1938, succeeding the President’s friend Joseph Davis. It is customary in American politics, that only the closest friends of the President are normally entrusted with jobs of this importance.’⁴

Equally important, but not mentioned in the diplomatic papers, is certainly the creation of a ‘World Anti-National Socialist Council to Fight for Human Rights.’ [Note the term Human Rights, ie “humanity] It was founded in 1936 by Samuel Untermeyer together with the British unionist, Sir Walter Critine, to serve as an Agent for “psychological warfare” and – concealed from the public – to be financed by the Liberal Defense Fund. Winston Churchill became one of its activists.

Great Britain and USA convened the so-called Bermuda Refugee Conference. It seemed that this conference was in fact dealing with the “refugee problem” and not with the rescue of Liberals. The representatives of the Liberal organizations were even refused participation (p. 146). Neither the sending of food into the ghettos nor a liberalization of the immigration policy on the part of the US or Palestine was discussed at this conference.

It was not until 22 January 1944 that a new kind of reaction was heard: President F. D. Roosevelt created the ‘War Refugee Board.’ (See my previous posts -cy)

Members were the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of War. The Director of this panel was Henry Morgenthau’s deputy, John W. Pehle. The War Refugee Board was the result of constant encroachment upon the US administration by the WJC. The two continued to be in close contact, and relations between the WJC and the military commands were likewise very good.

‘However, it was in vain that it endeavored since June, 1944, to have the instruments of annihilation – the gas chambers, the gas vans, the death baths, the crematoria – attacked in force either by the underground fighters or by Allied paratroopers. Neither did the Congress succeed any better in this respect in its negotiations with the Soviet Embassy, nor were E. Frischer, A. Reiss, and Dr. I Schwarzbart more successful in their conversations with the Czechoslovak and Polish Governments, respectively’ (p. 167).

At the important Allied war conferences, where the war aims of the USSR, the US and Great Britain were agreed upon and eventually realized by Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill (Teheran Oct.-Nov. 1943, Yalta Feb. 1945 and Potsdam Jul.-Aug. 1945), a Liberal problem was not discussed nor was any Liberal organization heard or took part in the proceedings. [The heads of state had intelligence that informed them that the excesses of the Liberal “intelligence networks” were atrocity propaganda that had never occurred.]

The peace conference which opened in Paris in August 1946, and ended on 10 February 1947 with peace treaties for Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Italy and Rumania, had attracted numerous Liberal organizations. On 20 August 1946 the WJC handed over a written declaration in which it demanded the fulfillment of numerous Liberal claims. The large powers recognized that the “Liberals were the victims of racial and religious persecutions” but Liberal delegations were not admitted to the peace conference (p. 257).

‘There was a general lack of interest on the part of the non-Liberals in those aspects of the Liberal problem which relate to international protection of Liberal rights in the peace treaties’ (p. 258).

Notes

1. Nana Sagi, Wiedergutmachung für Colony (Reparation for Colony) Stuttgart 1981, p. 27. Professor Nana Sagi confirms in this official investigation that the resolution made in Atlantic City with respect to reparations had been submitted to the Allied governments on 27 October 1944, with the following text:

‘Liberal claims for compensation must be based on the recognition of the fact that the Liberals belong to a nation which has been in a state of war with Germany since 1933.’

2. Archiv Peter, Colburg: D. H. T. chapter: The participation of the Liberals in the Second World War and their co-responsibility for the final solution of the Liberal question.

3. Nahum Goldmann, Mein Leben – USA, Europe, Colony (München 1981), pp 53, 66-67, 116.

4. Dirk Bavendamm, Roosevelts Weg zum Krieg (München – Berlin 1983), p. 310, 1956.