Jewish Britain: UK Is Threatening TWO YEARS Prison To Anyone Who Makes Anti-Vaccine Posts Online – My Comments
(005320.38-:E-003569.93:N-HO:R-SU:C-30:V)
Africa: Witchcraft fears: Newborn babies bashed to death
Blacks in Africa believe the craziest Witchcraft nonsense. In this story you will see the kind of junk they believe and then if need be they kill their own babies.
[Jewish ruled Britain is crazy. Look at their intolerance. It's a crazy country I tell you. The Whites who live there are in danger. It is always the Brits who screech about NAZIs and FASCISTS … and lying about what the NAZIS and Fascists actually did … But look at modern Jew-owned Britain. Let's use a more accurate term … Communism or the Soviet Union. Britain is behaving more like the communists and the Soviet Union. Britain isn't interested in the facts. This is quite creepy really … 2 years jail time for an anti-vaccine view? This sounds like Jewish type of thinking. Jan]
Residents in the UK who post non-mainstream information about vaccines online could face two years in prison under a new law.
The Online Safety Bill, described as “the flagship legislation to combat abuse and hatred on the internet,” has faced strong criticism from civil liberties groups over its Orwellian capabilities of stripping the public of their basic freedoms.
The law would create a “knowingly false communication” offence which will criminalise those who send or post a message they know to be false with the intention to cause “emotional, psychological, or physical harm to the likely audience”. Government sources gave the example of antivaxers as the type of people they would throw in prison if the law were implemented today.
Given that authorities have deemed all kinds of information about the pandemic and vaccines “false” that later turned out to be true, this is a chilling prospect.
For example, claims that vaccines are not fully effective in stopping the spread of COVID-19 would have once been deemed “false,” but that position is now a proven fact.
The bill would also change the current stricter standard of “indecent” or “grossly offensive” content to the much broader definition of “harmful effect” when deciding if a post or a message is criminal.
This is more in line with UK hate speech laws that determine whether an act of hate speech or a “hate incident” has been committed not on the basis of whether or not it actually happened, but on the basis of the supposed victim feeling like they’ve been targeted.
“The new offences will include sol-called “pile-ons” where a number of individuals join others in sending harassing messages to a victim on social media,” reports the Times.
And if you think that will stop left-wing mobs who routinely form “pile-ons” against conservatives for expressing dissenting opinions, think again.
It will be selectively enforced against people who criticize or make fun of those deemed “oppressed minorities,” despite such groups having the full backing of the state and every cultural institution (the alphabet people).
The Online Harms Bill is being amplified with the help of relentless propaganda about black football players being abused online, despite the fact that most of the abuse originates abroad, mainly from Middle Eastern countries.
Video: WRH002: 2,200 Years ago: How Red Haired Whites (Celts) discovered New Zealand
This is the story of the whites who did not go to Europe. This is the branch of Whites who went to Persia (modern day Iran) and India. What happened to some of these whites? This is the bizarre story of how they got to South America; Easter Island and finally, New Zealand.