IMPORTANT: USA: THEY ARE LYING ABOUT THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF CIRCUMCISION – ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION IS NOT GOOD!

(000228.79-:E-000157.73:N-:R-SU:C-30:V)   

[Read this summary that I compiled below and the AAP seems to be under some kind of Jewish pressure whereas other experts from elsewhere in the West are much firmer on this matter. Jan]

Numerous studies and critiques from Canada, Australia, and the United States have raised concerns about the portrayal of circumcision’s health benefits. Critics argue that some claims are exaggerated or based on selective evidence, and they emphasize ethical considerations such as bodily autonomy and informed consent.

Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS)
The CPS does not recommend routine infant circumcision, stating that the medical risk-to-benefit ratio is closely balanced.

They highlight that while circumcision may offer some health benefits, these are not significant enough to warrant universal application.

Australia
Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP)

The RACP advises against routine infant circumcision, noting that the potential medical benefits are not sufficient to justify the procedure for all male infants.

WARNING AAP – POSSIBLE JEWISH INFLUENCE HERE
United States: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

In 2012, the AAP stated that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but not enough to recommend universal circumcision.

TAKE SPECIAL NOTE OF THIS:
This position faced criticism from international physicians who argued that the AAP’s conclusions were influenced by cultural bias and that they downplayed risks and overstated benefits.
Pediatrics

Critiques and Ethical Considerations

Bioethicists like Brian D. Earp have argued that non-therapeutic infant circumcision violates bodily autonomy and that the purported health benefits do not justify the ethical concerns.

Some studies suggest that the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in male infants is low and can be effectively treated with antibiotics, questioning the necessity of circumcision for UTI prevention.

The claim that circumcision significantly reduces the risk of HIV transmission is based on studies conducted in specific African contexts, and critics argue that these findings may not be directly applicable to populations in developed countries.
ERIC

Summary

While circumcision may offer certain health benefits, such as a reduced risk of specific infections, many medical organizations and ethicists in Canada, Australia, and the United States caution against routine infant circumcision.