IMPORTANT CANADIAN, AUSTRALIAN & AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC STUDIES CRITICAL OF CIRCUMCISION
(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)
There are critical studies and policy statements from Canada, Australia, and the United States, though they vary by country. Here’s an overview of the key medical and ethical critiques from each:
- Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS)
Position (2015, reaffirmed 2023):
The CPS does not recommend routine infant circumcision.
Key points:
The risks (bleeding, infection, pain) may outweigh benefits for healthy infants.
Parents should be fully informed and consider ethical, cultural, and medical aspects.
They emphasize the child’s right to autonomy and bodily integrity.
"The medical risk:benefit ratio of routine newborn male circumcision is closely balanced when current evidence is reviewed."
— CPS Position Statement
- Australia
Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP)
Position (2010, under review as of 2023):
Does not support routine circumcision of male infants.
Recommends that circumcision only be considered for specific medical conditions.
Key points:
Benefits (e.g., reduced UTI risk) are marginal and do not justify routine use.
Ethical concern: irreversible procedure done without the child’s consent.
Cultural sensitivity is acknowledged, but secular medical justification is weak.
“The RACP believes that the potential medical benefits are not sufficient to warrant routine circumcision of all male infants in Australia.”
- United States
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Position (2012):
The AAP stated that the benefits outweigh the risks, but not enough to recommend universal circumcision.
Criticism of this position:
Over 30 international physicians and ethicists (from Europe, Canada, and the U.S.) published a response in the Pediatrics journal (2013), accusing the AAP of cultural bias.
They argued the AAP downplayed risks and ignored ethical concerns like autonomy and bodily integrity.
U.S. Critics and Studies
Brian D. Earp (Yale/Oxford): One of the most prolific American bioethicists criticizing circumcision. He argues that:
Infant circumcision violates bodily rights.
Health claims are exaggerated or culturally skewed.
Journal of Medical Ethics (various articles): Multiple pieces critical of circumcision as a non-consensual, medically unnecessary intervention.
Common Themes Across All Critiques:
Informed consent is not possible in infants.
Risk of complications is real, though rare.
Cultural norms influence decisions more than science.
Arguments are shifting toward ethical/human rights, not just medicine.
2007: US Generals too afraid to fight Iran Generals Threaten to Quit
Here is a very important story from my old AfricanCrisis archive. This shows you how unhappy American Generals were about attacking Iran. I bet that it‘s still very similar. They know it‘s too difficult.
Lots of Photos: NATIONAL SOCIALIST Gassings!!
This is a link to the Wayback Machine where you can see a wonderful old website with mountains of photos and articles about the enormous Liberal hoax of the story. NATIONAL SOCIALISTGASSINGS was a wonderful little website in it‘s day. You can still see many photos and stories on this page.
Get a Free PDF Book: The Battle for Rhodesia
This is a classic book from 1966. Douglas Reed was an excellent, truth-telling journalist and author who dared to write books telling the raw truth about many things. In 1936, he was in Europe and wrote a book warning that WW2 was coming. In 1966, he was in Rhodesia, and he wrote a similar book, wherein he warned of the coming war in Africa. There are many things he wrote in this book which have been forgotten. He writes about the two-faced British and of the insanity of America.