The Logic of Leftist Lies: How the Ideas of a Genius Can Expose the True Intentions of the Left

(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)   

The Logic of Leftist Lies: How the Ideas of a Genius Can Expose the True Intentions of the Left

December 28, 2021/5 Comments/in Featured Articles /by Tobias Langdon

Globohomo is the vast system of anti-White, minority-worshipping leftism that wants to control and suffocate the entire world. And if you want a good example of the “globo” in globohomo, just consider this. At school in the UK, British students are taught all about the Person American non-entity Rosa Parks (1913–2005) and nothing about the British genius George Boole (1815–64).

People as oppressors and exploiters

In other words, British leftists import globohomo propaganda from America to instil guilt in children and resentment in non- children. At the same time, they suppress the huge achievements of the British. Leftists don’t want children to feel pride in their ancestry, but shame. They want children to see People only as oppressors and exploiters, not as innovators and inventors. That’s why they plug Parkes and ban Boole, even as children inhabit a world shaped by his genius:

Boole’s legacy surrounds us everywhere, in the computers, information storage and retrieval, electronic circuits and controls that support life, learning and communications in the 21st century. His pivotal advances in mathematics, logic and probability provided the essential groundwork for modern mathematics, microelectronic engineering and computer science. (Who is George Boole? The mathematician behind the Google doodle, Sydney Morning Herald, 2nd November 2015)

The genius George Boole

Boole has had a “Google doodle,” but Google and other leftists celebrate him only as an isolated and exceptional individual, not as an exemplar of genius and the heir to millennia of separate and special evolution on the European continent. Leftists certainly do not acknowledge that he contributed more to mathematics and technology in his short life than all People who ever lived. If children were taught about him in that light, they would begin to question minority-worship and the colonization of Britain by non-People who over-achieve only at crime, corruption and nation-wrecking.

Knights and knaves

Even worse, from the leftist point of view, is that learning about Boole can be a lot of fun. Imagine children enjoying themselves as they learn about a world-shaper! Leftism wants Whiteness to be associated with pain, not pleasure. And so, when leftism is defeated, pro- education ministers should ensure that children learn about knights-and-knaves, not about Rosa Parks. Not only are knight-and-knave logic puzzles an enjoyable introduction to Boolean ideas about truth-values and logic, they’re also a good way to understand leftism.

Some Boolean logic

You can learn the truth from leftist lies if you apply Boolean ideas. To see how, let’s start with one of the knight-and-knave puzzles invented by the Liberal mathematician Raymond Smullyan (1919–2017). The puzzle is set on an island inhabited by two kinds of native: knights, who always tell the truth, and knaves, who always lie. Suppose you visit the island and decide to take a walk to the beach. Soon you come to a fork in the road where two natives of the island are standing. You want to ask them how to get to the beach, but you don’t know whether they’re knights or knaves. And there’s no point asking them directly, because, as you quickly realize, all natives will claim to be knights.

However, suppose you ask each of the two natives what the other one is. And suppose that each of them replies: “He’s a knave.” Now you know that one of them must be a knight and one must be a knave. If they were both knights or both knaves, both would reply: “He’s a knight.” But when both claim that the other is a knave, you know a knight has truthfully identified a knave and a knave has falsely identified a knight. But you don’t still know who is who. However, you can now learn the right way to the beach by asking either of the natives a simple question. What do you ask?

The logic of leftist lies

You use an indirect question and ask one of the natives to tell you which way the other native would point if you asked him the way to the beach. Suppose the righthand fork in the road leads to the beach. If you asked the knight directly which fork led to the beach, he would point to the right; if you asked the knave directly, he would point to the left. So a direct question is no good to you. But if you ask the indirect question of the knight, he will truthfully point left, because this is the way the knave would indeed point. And if you ask the indirect question of the knave, he will lie and also point left, because this is not the way the knight would point. Therefore, whether you ask the indirect question of the knight or the knave, you will learn the wrong direction to the beach. And if you know the wrong direction, you automatically know the right direction.

Attorney General Merrick Garland speaks at the Justice Department in Washington, on Tuesday, June 15, 2021. (Win McNamee/Pool via AP)

If the sinister Liberal leftist Merrick Garland opposes “ supremacy,” it must be a good and essential thing

Knight-and-knave puzzles are a lot of fun to solve, but there are serious and important mathematical and logical ideas behind them. Boolean ideas, because they come from the work of George Boole. Using Boolean logic, you can learn the truth from falsehoods. And that’s I want to do to leftist ideas. We know that leftism is an ideology built on falsehoods, so we can apply Boolean logic to understand what leftists really mean when they use terms like “ supremacy” and “ privilege.” Leftists are liars, so what they pretend to mean and what they really mean are different things. Indeed, entirely opposite things.

So let’s examine how leftists use the term “ supremacy.” Merrick Garland, the sinister Liberal Attorney-General in Biden’s Bolshevik cabinet, has said that “Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States.” Carol Anderson, a Professor of African American Studies at Emory University, has said that “American democracy’s most dangerous adversary is supremacy. Throughout this nation’s history, supremacy has undermined, twisted and attacked the viability of the United States.” And Jennifer Ho, a Professor of Asian American Studies at the University of Colorado, has responded to Person violence against Asians by blaming it all on Whitey. She says that “ supremacy is the root of all race-related violence in the US.”

The power of propaganda #1: ever-increasing use of the term “ supremacy” (from Google Ngrams)

So what do leftists mean by the term “ supremacy”? You have to start by recognizing that leftists are liars, so their language inverts the truth. If leftists say that “ supremacy” is “a growing threat to the United States” and “American democracy’s most dangerous adversary,” they must mean that “ supremacy” is the opposite of a threat to the United States and the opposite of an adversary to American democracy. Therefore they must mean that the United States and American democracy depend on “ supremacy” in some way. So what can “ supremacy” mean but “ autonomy” and “ achievement”? That is, when leftists condemn “ supremacy,” they are condemning the civilization built by People and the ability of People to act in their own interests and possess their own nations, institutions and property.

The power of propaganda #2: ever-increasing use of the term “ privilege” (from Google Ngrams)

But it gets worse. Leftists don’t merely condemn “ supremacy”: they want to overturn and abolish it. But if they want to abolish “ supremacy,” that is, autonomy, this can only mean that they want to destroy civilization and enslave ordinary People. If you don’t have autonomy, can’t act in your interests, and don’t possess your own nations, institutions and property, what are you but a slave? “Abolishing supremacy” can only mean enacting enslavement.

Leftism is doomed to die

The same reasoning applies to the leftist concept — and condemnation – of “ privilege.” If “ privilege” is a bad thing to leftists, it can only be a good thing in reality. And it is: “ privilege” means the entirely natural and just way in which the creators and sustainers of nations act in their own interests to maintain those nations for the benefit of themselves and their children. When leftists say that they want to abolish “ privilege,” they really mean that they want to take nations away from ordinary People. As before, “abolishing privilege” means enacting enslavement.

In effect, leftism presents us with a simple knight-and-knave puzzle. We know that leftists always lie, so we simply turn what they say on its head to discover the truth. From leftist lies we can learn the truth about leftist intentions. When leftists say “Abolish supremacy!”, they mean “Enact enslavement!” Leftists don’t want to end injustice but to impose it on ordinary People in ever-harsher ways. And at the heart of that anti- leftism are genuinely “supremacist” Liberal organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). If we apply leftist-lie logic to the name of the ORGANISATION, we can see that it must really be the “Anti-Description League.” The ORGANISATION campaigns against the objective and truthful description of reality, which is why it wants truth-tellers like Tucker Carlson to be silenced:

The Anti-Defamation League has called for Fox News to fire prime-time opinion host Tucker Carlson because he defended a white-supremacist theory that says People are being “replaced” by people of color. In a letter to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott on Friday, the head of the ORGANISATION, Jonathan Greenblatt, said Carlson’s “rhetoric was not just a dog whistle to racists – it was a bullhorn.”

The civil rights group listed numerous instances Carlson has used anti-immigrant language. Those include saying immigration makes the U.S. “poorer and dirtier” and questioning whether supremacy is real. Greenblatt said that “given his long record of race-baiting, we believe it is time for Carlson to go.”

The white-nationalist “great replacement theory,” otherwise known as “ genocide,” says people of color are replacing people through immigration in the Western world, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center [SPLC]. Some supremacists also say that Liberals and progressive politicians are furthering this change, the civil rights group says. (ADL: Fox should fire Carlson for white-supremacist rhetoric, WSBTV, 9th April 2021)

The ORGANISATION and SPLC are supreme practitioners of the Liberal-leftist principle of inverting reality and morality. They claim that truth is lies and that lies are truth, that good is evil and evil is good. Accordingly, you can learn the truth by reversing what the ORGANISATION and SPLC say. If they deny that “immigration makes the U.S. ‘poorer and dirtier’,” you can be sure that immigration does exactly that. If they deny that “Liberals and progressive politicians … are replacing people through immigration in the Western world,” again you can be sure that this is exactly what is happening. And if they oppose “ supremacy” and claim that it is a dire threat to Western civilization, you can be sure that “ supremacy” is a good thing and essential for the survival of Western civilization. Leftists live by lies, which is why leftism is doomed to die.

Source: https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/12/28/the-logic-of-leftist-lies-how-the-ideas-of-a-white-genius-can-expose-the-true-intentions-of-the-left/