The Indians of North America were just as brutal as the Blacks in Africa: Executions, Slavery and War

[Paul Fromm in Canada sent me these quotes below. When I read this, I can tell you it is no different to what Whites found here in Africa. It was very similar. Tribes fought each other and raided each other. If you look at the Zulus, their King ordered executions at will and he chose whether you would die nicely (get bashed on your head to die quickly), or whether you would die in a cruel way (have sticks knocked up your rectum into your stomach so you die in agony over a period of a few days). The Indians of North America were, probably, a lot more intelligent and DANGEROUS than the Blacks of Africa. They were of Asian ancestry and had a higher IQ. So that made them more dangerous. They also had some very nasty concepts like scalping. I don't know of scalping in Africa. There White men who experienced the horror of scalping in North America. To be honest with you, I cannot see that Whites should be listening to Jews and Liberals and wishing that those people should be ruling you. I think you'll discover the HORROR of what those people really are. Integrating massively different races into one country is only possible if Whites are the boss and have the raw military power to keep it running ok. Anything else, like the garbage that comes from Jews and Liberals is extremely dangerous. It is, in short, INSANE. Jan]

Read some of the horror that Paul sent me:

From the pages of Graeber and Wengrow’s The Dawn of Everything we learn about the Calusa Indians of the Florida Keys—the slavery, genocide and dictatorship perpetrated by their leaders (p. 151). We are informed concerning the Natchez people of Louisiana: their monarch was known as the Natchez Sun. “He appeared to wield unlimited power. His every movement was greeted by elaborate rituals of deference, bowing and scraping; he could order arbitrary executions, help himself to any of his subject’s possessions and do pretty much anything he liked” (The Dawn of Everything, p. 156).

Graeber and Wengrow report that “Among Aboriginal societies on the Northwest Coast…(f)rom the Klamath River northwards, there existed societies dominated by warrior aristocracies engaged in frequent inter-group raiding and in which, traditionally, a significant portion of the population had consisted of chattel slaves. This apparently had been true as long as anyone living there could remember…Throughout this entire region, a 1500 mile strip of land from the Copper River delta to Cape Mendocino, inter-group raiding for slaves was endemic, and had been for as long as anyone could recall. In all these societies of the Northwest Coast, nobles alone enjoyed the ritual prerogative to engage with guardian spirits who conferred access to aristocratic titles, and the right to keep the slaves captured in raids” (pp. 176-177, 182).

“… slaves (of the Natives) on the northwest coast were hewers of wood and drawers of water, but they were especially involved in the mass harvesting, cleaning and processing of salmon and other anadromous fish…The first European accounts of the region in the late eighteenth century speak of slaves…These accounts suggest that perhaps a quarter of the indigenous Northwest Coast population lived in bondage —which is about the equivalent to proportions found in the Roman Empire, or classical Athens, or indeed the cotton plantations of the American South.

“What’s more, slavery on the Northwest Coast was a hereditary status: if you were a slave, your children were also fated to be so…Current archaeological and ethno-historical research…suggests that the institution of slavery goes back a very long way indeed on the Northwest Coast, many centuries before European ships began docking at Nootka Sound to trade in otter pelts and blankets…on the (North)west Coast we can… observe how many of the elements that later came together in the institution of slavery emerged at roughly the same time, starting around 1850 B.C., in what’s called the Middle Pacific period…” (p. 186).