Belgian outrage: The Rape, Torture & murder of White Children by the Elite: Marc Dutroux – My Comments


[This is a very bizarre case and it caused massive outrage in Belgium. The person at the heart of it all, Marc Dutroux, got off very lightly TWICE … but people related to this case dropped dead like flies … and many very weird things happened. Very convenient "mistakes" … one after the other helped. This particular case might be one of the best examples that "Elite" and Jews rape, torture and even kill White children in a twisted way that is reminiscent of the Jew paedophile Jeffrey Eptsein. More and more witnesses were coming to the fore about this case and were willing to testify, but bit by bit, this case was "managed" into failure … in the same way the Epstein never went to trial and the same way the Jew Lord Janner never went on trial. Quietly, the whole system "accidentally" works so that we never see the rule of law and we never see, in public the evidence. I suspect this is to protect the real crooks who are right at the top. My own thinking is that Jews use sex, especially deviant sex and even "criminal sex" (e.g. killing of children) as a way of "bonding" to the elite so that the elite can NEVER betray them, because to do so would be their own end. This is why you get that British Prince who had sex with under age girls, but he is being protected and he will never go on trial and we'll never really know the truth. TOO MUCH IS HIDDEN. And I strongly suspect you'll find Jews crawling all around this. I think the purpose of this is so that the Jews can take control of powerful people and ensure they never betray them. Thus they have these powerful people under their control for the rest of their lives. I suspect Trump too, with his links to Epstein, was compromised … and what of Bill Gates, etc. The most creepy, weird, bizarre nasty thing I've come across is the idea of hunting White children in forests like animals and killing them. This disgusts me, but this might have taken place. Sadly, all the really key stuff … is hidden. So much is hidden … Police forces in the West must be sitting on extreme BOMB SHELLS of stories that would make people go crazy if they knew. Jan]

Here are just a few extracts from wikipedia about this nasty case. But I looked into various things relating to it, and there’s no doubt in my mind some very nasty stuff went on here. At the wikipedia source link you’ll be shocked by the number of related people who died mysteriously … just like the Clinton body count. That can only mean that really powerful people were knocking out those who could have let the truth out if they ended up in court. So here are a few items, but you can read a lot on wikipedia itself:

Dutroux was convicted in 1989 for the abduction and rape of five young girls, with his then-wife Michelle Martin and other accomplices. He was released on parole after three years in prison.[2]

In 1996, Dutroux was arrested on suspicion of having kidnapped, tortured and sexually abused six girls aged between 8 and 19, four of whom died. His widely publicized trial took place in 2004. Dutroux was convicted of all charges, along with the murder of a suspected former accomplice, and sentenced to life imprisonment. Dutroux’s accomplices included Michelle Martin, Michel Lelièvre, Michel Nihoul, and Bernard Weinstein. Martin was convicted and sentenced as an accomplice to 30 years in prison, while Lelièvre was sentenced to 25 years. Nihoul, "a Brussels businessman, pub-owner and familiar face at sex parties",[3] was initially tried as an accomplice to the kidnappings, but was acquitted of these charges due to insufficient evidence. He was instead convicted of involvement in a gang that participated in human and drug trafficking and was sentenced to five years in prison.[4] Weinstein was never tried, as he was murdered by Dutroux.

A number of shortcomings in the Dutroux investigation caused widespread discontent in Belgium with the country’s criminal justice system, and the ensuing scandal was one of the reasons for the reorganisation of Belgium’s law enforcement agencies and widespread allegations of corruption and infiltration of the Belgian justice system by a criminal enterprise. In the White March, 300,000 Belgian citizens protested the mishandling of the case.

Cult assertions

Magnee also asserted that the prosecutors did not follow up on evidence pointing to a cult called "Abrasax", which allegedly performed human sacrifices.[49] In a wooden house owned by Bernard Weinstein, a letter was found from the occult sect "Abrasax", in which a gift for Dominique Kindermans, the high priestress,[50] was mentioned, consisting of 17 girls between the age of 2 and 20 for anal, oral and vaginal sex. It was signed by priest "Anubis".[citation needed] This priest was later identified as Francis De Smedt.[citation needed] Later investigations showed that four policemen in Charleroi were also members of the sect; one was even the treasurer.[51] The headquarters of Institut Abrasax in Rue Emile Vandervelde 223 Forchies La Marche was raided in 1996 by 150 officers. Video of the raid showed police taking away bags of papers, video cassettes and a refrigerator. They also took away black magic ritual implements and human skulls.[50]

Claims by the victims’ families

Paul Marchal, the father of the murdered An Marchal, accused the police and the judicial system of a cover-up in 2001. He was angry that still in 2001 the trial had not started even though Dutroux had been under arrest for several years. Marchal said: "It feels like they don’t want to find the truth. It is not a good feeling and not only I think this."[40]

Carine Russo and her husband Gino Russo were not permitted to identify their daughter and look at her body. They were told by authorities that Dutroux had identified her and that that was enough.[3] The autopsy of Mélissa showed that she had been raped repeatedly over a prolonged period of time. No DNA evidence was taken from the body to conclusively make sure that only Dutroux had raped her. Dutroux always denied raping Mélissa and Julie.[3]

Eventually several families of victims boycotted the official trial, stating that it was a circus and there had been no progress in the case since the removal of judge Connerotte.[48]

Failure to review video tapes confiscated from Dutroux

During the search of the houses of Dutroux, about a hundred video tapes were found.[38] They were never looked at. Some of them showed Dutroux constructing the dungeon in which Lejeune and Russo were held. Had police looked at them, they might have found the dungeon containing Lejeune and Russo.[3] The video tapes had been in the possession of the police since December 1995. They had been passed on to the prosecutors in the case, but not to the judges.[39] Furthermore, some of the video tapes were returned to Dutroux by police officer René Michaux without ever being looked at.[citation needed]

Michel Bourlet, who was appointed lead investigator, said that some of the video tapes had disappeared and that he wanted to have them all recovered and reviewed.[38]

The videos were reportedly stolen after they were returned to Dutroux.[38] In 1999 some of the tapes were finally reviewed. One of them showed Dutroux raping a young woman in Slovakia.[38] The videos could have made it possible to identify other victims and also to determine the severity of the torture that the victims had to endure during their ordeal.[38]

Later during the trial, the lawyer of one of the victims, Laetitia Delhez, also expressed disappointment that the videos were not reviewed, because they could have proved that Dutroux was not acting alone.[38]

Testimony of judge Jean-Marc Connerotte in court

Connerotte testified in the Dutroux case on 4 March 2004. He broke down in the witness box stating that there had been high-level murder plots to stop his investigation into the child-sex mafia. He stated that he had to drive in bullet-proof cars and had armed guards around him at all times because shadowy figures from the crime world were threatening him. The police had informed him that murder contracts had been taken out against the prosecutors in the case. He alleged that organised crime methods were used to discredit his work and make sure that the investigation would end in a judicial failure.[48]

Connerotte criticised authorities for not rescuing Lejeune and Russo, even though Dutroux had been a prime suspect for one year before they were found dead. Connerotte also said that he had received files describing a child-sex network. It described seizure of children and foreign trafficking. The sum of 150,000 francs was mentioned as the price for a girl.[48] Connerotte also said that he was doubtful of the official explanation on how Lejeune and Russo died. It was said that they starved to death in the dungeon. An adult can last about three days without water and maximum 60 days without food. If they received nothing to drink and eat they should have been dead very soon after Dutroux was imprisoned. However, Michelle Martin insisted that they were still alive when he returned.[48] Connerotte had even written to King Albert II of Belgium in 1996, stating that his investigations into crime networks were being blocked because suspects "received serious protection". The judge said that the "dysfunctional judiciary" was breaking down as mafia groups took secret control of the "key institutions of the country".[48]

Book by chairman of the parliamentary inquiry Marc Verwilghen

Marc Verwilghen, the chairman of the parliamentary inquiry into the handling of the Dutroux case, reported attempts in a book he published in 1999 to stifle their investigation into how the case had been handled. Verwilghen eventually published a book that claimed that the commission’s findings had been muzzled by political and judicial leaders to prevent the revelation of details that would have implicated the complicity of additional perpetrators. Verwilghen claimed that senior political and legal figures refused to cooperate with the inquiry. He said magistrates and police were officially told to refuse to answer certain questions, in what he described as ‘a characteristic smothering operation’. Verwilghen blamed Langlois for refusing to hand over evidence of official protection for Dutroux. He said that if they had received that information, their report would have been without doubt more precise and detailed. Verwilghen added that for him, the Dutroux affair was a question of organised crime.[54]

Statements by senator Anne-Marie Lizin

The Belgian senator Anne-Marie Lizin commented on the case saying: "Stupidity (by the police) can’t be the only explanation. It’s a question of stupidity, incompetence and corruption. Dutroux must be a friend of somebody important. Or else he was being protected because he was known to be a police informant." Lizin said Dutroux was not a true pedophile, as he has been portrayed. He had a record of dealing in stolen cars, selling arms to hoodlums and trafficking in prostitution. "When he discovered that men paid a lot more for little girls for prostitution, he started kidnapping them," she said. When Dutroux finally was arrested, police found in his house video films of him raping little girls. They said he did this so he could sell the films to pedophiles.[55]

Public outcry

In October 1996 more than 300,000 Belgians marched through the streets of Brussels after judge Jean-Marc Connerotte was removed from the case. He was removed for attending a fundraising dinner for the families of the victims, which the court system claimed damaged his impartiality.[3] They demanded an investigation and reform of the police and justice system. The protest was called the "White March".[40][3][44] Connerotte was beloved by the public because the only two surviving victims were rescued on his initiative, which made him a national hero.[44] Protesters were wearing signs that said "Stop the cover-up".[44]

To protest the prospect of a conditional release of Dutroux, a "Black March" was organised on the 23rd anniversary of the historic "White March" protest that was held in Brussels on 20 October 1996. The calls to take part in the march were made after it was made public that a court had approved the request of Michel Lelièvre for conditional release, who was an accomplice of Dutroux and had received a 25-year sentence.[72]

The Guardian reported in 2004 that "the entire credibility of the current reformist government of Guy Verhofstadt and Belgium’s very reputation as a normal civilised country is on the line."[73]

Assassination of André Cools

The assassination of André Cools took place in 1991. The revelations in the Cools case coincided with the revelations in the Dutroux case and in total made the Belgian public lose trust in their government. Van der Biest was eventually convicted but had already been investigated five years prior as the one who ordered the contract hit on Cools. Due to failures in the investigation he was not charged. It was found that several Belgian politicians had been bribed with large sums of money by an Italian helicopter manufacturer, Agusta, in exchange for military contracts. This included Belgian secretary general of NATO, Willy Claes. There were allegations that both the assassination of Cools and the case surrounding Dutroux showed that organised crime had spread in Belgium and that the institutions were not efficient in combatting the spread or corruption and organised crime.[7]


%d bloggers like this:
Skip to toolbar