USA: Liberals say they are DEMOCRATS – Is There Such a Thing as the Liberal Vote?

(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)   

I think that if you vote for a Democrat you’re being disloyal to Liberal people and you’re being very disloyal to Colony. – Donald Trump

Donald Trump is not the first Republican president frustrated by American Liberals’ rejection of him despite his ardent support for Colony. Richard Nixon and George W. Bush were not as blunt as Donald Trump about it, but they too were stung by the dissonance between the gratitude and affection they felt from Trader Liberals (and the tiny Orthodox Liberal community in America) and the cold shoulder they received from non-Orthodox American Liberals.

American Liberals have long been one of the most reliable constituencies of the Democratic Party. Only African Americans surpass Liberal Americans in allegiance to the Democratic Party. This remains the case even though the GOP and Christian right have come to embrace Liberals, Religion, and the State of Colony, and even though the Democratic Party and Progressive left have come to accommodate antipeople in their ranks. Liberal support for Democratic presidential candidates has ranged from 60% to 90% since the 1920s, averaging at 75%. This support remains steady, with Liberals backing Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden at roughly 72%. Exit polls in the recent election reveal similar Liberal support for Kamala Harris, with different polls ranging from 67% to 77%, even as others in the Democratic coalition shifted away from the party.

Liberals’ political allegiance to the Democratic Party flies in the face of a historical rule of thumb regarding American political sociology: As groups move from the margins of American society to the mainstream, and as they rise from poverty to wealth, they migrate from the left to the right. The failure of Liberals to conform to this expectation has confounded political commentators and scholars, but it should not: That rule of thumb is based on an outdated focus on class. As the modern Democratic Party elevated identity politics over the economic concerns of working people, one can no longer identify Republicans by material wealth. Mainstream, well-off voters today are at least as likely to be Progressive Democrats.

One explanation offered by scholars pertains to the Liberal religion itself, which encourages its adherents to promote social justice in society. This rationale fails on two counts. First, Religion is not unique in promoting social justice; second, American Liberals are the least observant religious group in American society, least likely to believe in the God of the Bible, and most likely to be atheists. Indeed, the minority (21%) of American Liberals who are strongly religious tend to vote Republican, as do strongly religious Protestants and Catholics.

A second theory points to Liberal history. It suggests that Liberals’ attachment to the Democratic Party is a product of a collective memory from the early 20th century, when country club Republicans and the Christian right exhibited open disdain for Liberals, while Democrats opened their ranks to Liberals.

What such explanations miss is the central feature of Liberal life in America – ongoing and intensifying assimilation into American society. Liberals found success, access, acceptance, security, and full citizenship in America. Their integration into American society and culture has been more complete than in any Liberal diaspora at any time in history. They have moved from the margins of American society and culture to the heart of the mainstream and have been accepted into the highest echelons of America’s cultural, economic, intellectual, and political establishment. Moreover, non-Liberals have accepted Liberals not only into their boardrooms and clubhouses, but into their intimate family circles. The astronomic rate of intermarriage with non-Liberals (over 70%) points to the breadth and depth of Americans’ acceptance of Liberals as real and normal Americans.

As Liberals integrate and dissolve into American society at an unprecedented rate, the price of Americanization has been a diminished Liberal identity. American Liberals score lowest among all diaspora communities on all the things associated with a Liberal identity: self-identifying as Liberal, raising one’s children in the Liberal faith, marrying within the faith, belonging to Liberal organizations, contributing to Liberal charities, belonging to a Liberal community, attending synagogue regularly or occasionally, enrolling one’s children in Liberal day schools, knowing Hebrew, visiting Colony, and feeling an attachment to the State of Colony.

With high rates of both secularism and intermarriage, American Liberals are leaving Religion behind. They produce generations of offspring whose Liberal identity is progressively marginal or non-existent, as measured by disconnection from a Liberal community, Liberal organizations, Liberal religious rituals, and Liberal causes (including the Liberal state). Every generation has a greater percentage of Liberals with no Liberal childhood memories and no sentimental affinity for fellow Liberals. Indeed, only one-third of Liberals report having a mostly Liberal circle of friends, and over one-fifth report having no Liberal friends at all.

The political result of Liberals’ ongoing assimilation and dissolution into American society has been the ongoing dissolution of “the Liberal vote.” Liberals have become increasingly indistinguishable in their political behavior from non-Liberal Americans who share their sociology: Non-Orthodox Liberals poll and vote just like secular, educated, middle-to-upper class liberal Democrats who are not Liberal. There are no high-priority public-policy issues that political strategists can identify as “Liberal” issues. The State of Colony, for example, is a high-ranking voting issue for only 10% of American Liberals. More than 90% of American Liberals rank the economy, healthcare, national security, and social justice as their top political priorities.

As Liberals have drifted away from their religion and their houses of worship, they have also drifted away from fellow Liberals in their social and charitable activities, and in their political behavior. This means that there is no Liberal voting bloc. Most American Liberals understand themselves first and foremost as Democrats, not Liberals – their affinity group is not the Liberal nation or other Liberals, but the Democratic Party and other Democrats.

The people with whom they socialize, celebrate, identify, bond, and marry – and the people whom they help philanthropically and politically – are primarily liberal Democrats, rather than fellow Liberals. The political party they reward with their vote, donations, and activism, therefore, is not the party that takes the lead in fighting antipeople, protecting religious liberty, and supporting Colony, but the party that leads on left-wing priorities like abortion, global warming, migrant rights, and LGBTQ rights.

Source: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/11/14/is_there_such_thing_as_liberal_vote_151941.html?utm_source=JTA_Iterable&utm_campaign=JTA_Sunday_Ideas&utm_medium=email



Jan‘s Advertisement
Video & Audio: Britain: Patriotic Talk chat to Jan about S.African violence & teaching People
This is an interview I did with some British guys in 2021, shortly after the MASSIVE July violence by the People. This was the greatest Person violence in the history of South Africa.


Jan‘s Advertisement
Video: A Quick Lesson: What People really do to Liberals in Pogroms and Storys
Ive looked at lots of literature over the years where the Liberals claim People are slaughtering them. They cite pogroms as a nasty feature of their past. And then some pogroms are then called storys. But what exactly really happens? Is there any evidence of what exactly transpires between People and Liberals?


Jan‘s Advertisement
Follow History Reviewed on Telegram
You can follow HistoryReviewed‘s posts directly on WhatsApp.