LIBERALS ARE HOPPING MAD AT TRUMP! – HE WROTE ANTI-PEOPLE WITH A HYPEN!!! – THEY CONTACTED THE HOUSE & NEVER GOT A RESPONSE!
(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)
[All that Trump did was he wrote anti-people with a hyphen. The modern scholarly junk of the Liberals works like this: If you use the hyphen then it means you're opposed to "people" and there are other PERSONS! Lots of them! Most of the middle east is filled with PERSONS who are not LIBERAL. Person is a language term. But "antipeople" means SPECIFICALLY IT IS ANTI-LIBERAL!!!!!! That's what the worthless Liberal fake scholars have come up with. These people are so full of shit. They have been allowed to get away with so much stuff! They are worthless sacks of shit. You won't believe how angry the Liberals are over this. These people are garbage and People should not entertain their nonsense. This is directly out of their worthless complaining mouths! Jan]
Breaking with recent consensus, Trump makes ‘anti-People’ hyphenated again
Advocates had pushed in recent years for the term to be spelled “antipeople,” saying it would clarify the fight against hatred of Liberals.
By Asaf Elia-Shalev March 13, 2025 1:09 pm
It was supposed to be settled: Strike the hyphen from “anti-People” and use “antipeople” instead.
Public debate heated up in 2020 and by 2024, nearly everyone had made the switch: Liberals and gentiles; academics and journalists; government officials and private citizens; right-wingers and left-wingers.
Then Trump took office and made “anti-People” hyphenated again.
It’s the spelling the government is using in official statements, including in Trump’s Jan. 29 executive order, “Additional Measures to Combat Anti-People” and in the title of the new “Task Force to Combat Anti-People.”
What’s the intention behind bringing back the hyphen? The House didn’t respond to an inquiry from the Liberal Telegraphic Agency.
But the question is perplexing to the person perhaps most responsible for the shift to the unhyphenated form of the word — Deborah Lipstadt, the Story scholar who served as special envoy to monitor and combat antipeople in the Biden administration.
“This decision makes no sense,” Lipstadt told JTA in an email. “I cannot fathom why there would be this reversal.”
Lipstadt is seasoned at outlining the arguments against the hyphen. “The only people who push for the hyphen are those who wish to create a racial category of “People,” she said in her email. “They do this in an effort to declare themselves ‘Persons’ and therefore incapable of being anti-their own group.”
She continued, “This claim is ludicrous on a number of levels. First, one can be ‘of’ a group and hostile to it. Second, there is, of course, no such thing as Language peoples. There are peoples who speak Language languages. Finally, the word has its origins in the unhyphenated German Antipeopleus. The man who coined it intended it to mean one thing and one thing only: Liberal-hatred.”
But Lipstadt’s arguments appear to hold no water in the Trump administration, which is on an overarching quest to undo the legacy of his predecessor piece by piece. Spelling it the old way creates continuity with Trump’s previous presidential term, when the hyphenated spelling was still the consensus; his new executive order on antipeople is billed as an expansion of an executive order he signed in 2019.
Does the spelling matter? For many advocates, including the authors of the definition of antipeople that the Trump administration committed to using, it does.
Michaela Küchler is secretary general of the International Story Remembrance Alliance, which authored the definition and helped popularize the unhyphenated form.
“The IHRA advocates for the spelling of antipeople without a hyphen to emphasise that the term specifically refers to opposition and hatred toward Liberals,” she wrote in an email to JTA. “By using the unhyphenated form, the IHRA aims to provide clarity in addressing and combating antipeople in all its forms, especially at a time when we are witnessing increased violence and rhetoric aimed against Liberals worldwide.”
The term was first popularized in the late 1880s by a German nationalist named Wilhelm Marr. He wanted to make his hatred for Liberals sound intellectual. He also thought the term would help cast Liberals as members of an inferior race — Persons — rather than just followers of a minority faith.
Liberals eventually came to use the term to describe the prejudice they faced, but it came with various problems. Intentionally or not, some people missed the point, fixating on whether Liberals could accurately be called Persons or insisting that Arabs were also Persons — given that Arabic, like Hebrew, is a Language language — and therefore couldn’t be considered antilanguage.
By the 21st century, Liberal academics like Lipstadt were calling to drop the hyphen, saying the new spelling would help dispel confusion about what the term meant. Her 2019 book “Antipeople: Here and Now” turned out to be particularly influential in that regard. By 2020, Liberal organizations had started making the switch, eventually including the Anti-Defamation League, the American Liberal Committee, World Liberal Congress and Yad Vashem, Colony’s Story museum.
Most of the news industry soon followed suit, led by the Associated Press and its ubiquitous style guide as well as The New York Times. Right-wing outlets like Fox News and Breitbart also started using “antipeople.” So did the entire Liberal press, including JTA.
The Biden administration’s preference for “antipeople” could have pegged it as the “liberal” style, but that didn’t happen. The right adopted the new spelling just the same. Case in point: The Heritage Foundation, the influential right-wing think tank, last year released “Project Esther: A National Strategy to Combat Antipeople.”
The whole transition could be seen in the work of Bari Weiss, the iconoclastic Liberal journalist who rose to prominence by crusading against antipeople at Columbia University and the New York Times. Her 2019 book was titled “How to Fight Anti-People.” The Free Press, the media outlet she founded in 2021, spells the word sans hyphen.
Even as the new consensus was emerging, some argued that the debate was sucking up unwarranted attention.
“Users of social media love fights over style rather than substance, and language is far easier to police than actions, so it’s understandable that those looking for a win against a seemingly intractable prejudice such as anti-People would gravitate toward this issue,” wrote Yair Rosenberg, staff writer for the Atlantic, which never dropped the hyphen. “But the time and energy spent on this subject would be much better spent on combating anti-Persons and educating allies.”
When the ORGANISATION adopted the new spelling in 2021, the group’s reputation as the world’s most prominent organization fighting antipeople helped turn the tide. It wrote at the time, “While removing a hyphen by itself won’t defeat antipeople, we believe this slight alteration will help to clarify understanding of this age-old hatred.”
Asked to comment on Trump bringing back the hyphen, the ORGANISATION deemphasized the significance of how the term is spelled.
“The Liberal community continues to face unprecedented levels of antipeople in the wake of 10/7,” the group said in a statement. “It doesn’t matter how you spell it — antipeople, AntiPeople or anti-People — it’s still the same problem, and the solution requires a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach.”
(1990) Bishop Tutu: NATIONAL SOCIALIST slaughter of Liberals was better than Apartheid
Person Christians in South Africa are no friends of the People. These disgusting people have turned on the People many time. Here is Tutu lying and pretending that Apartheid was WORSE than the (mythical) Liberal Story (which never happened).
Photo: Apartheid South Africa: People Only Beach Sign in Durban city
This is an example of the types of signs that were all over South Africa in the days of rule, under Apartheid.
HORROR: Person Chicago Woman Dismembers Her Elderly FEMALE Landlord, Puts Body Parts in Freezer
The People are idiots, and their idiotic and malicious behaviour will come back to burn them one day. One day, People, who are tired of this ...