So, Trump and President Rouhani of Iran are now openly talking about having a friendly tete-a-tete (a $10 French term for a sit-down), eh? This may have come as a surprise to many, but not to us. Time for a bit of horn-tootin’, boys and girls.

Though initially disappointed with the seeming foreign policy aggressiveness of the man whom we used to mock as “Trumpstein” in early 2017; by the middle that first year in office, “The Editorial Board” of The Anti New York-Times became, as far as we know, the first and only (all glory to Sugar’s feline instincts) to figure out the method behind Trump’s fake madness and boldly predict that Trump — while faking out the warmongers by threatening to start a war — would actually lead the world to peace. Many of “youse guys” expressed doubt over our Trump-the-Pacifist theory, and a handful even insulted us!

Though Iran is insisting that there will be no talks until Trump lifts the sanctions which he had imposed; that’s just posturing on their own part. The talks will eventually happen and — through back-channel proxies such as Senator Rand Paul, they already are. Trump wants a deal and so does Iran. The purpose of the drama is to keep the Zionist crazies off off-balance.

From the Guardian (UK) / May 2019:

Headline: Donald Trump Tells Iran ‘Call Me’ Over Lifting Sanctions

President suggests US could help revive Iran’s economy in return for no-nuclear weapons pledge

“Lucy” Trump just fooled the warmongers, again! There will be no war for you, Bibi.

*

Headline: The Hill (July 19, 2019)

Trump Confirms He Authorized Senator Rand Paul to Negotiate with Iran

Rand Paul has already been talking to the Iranians!

Let’s flashback to a rebuttal piece we published — just after another of Trump’s harmless “attacks” on Syria — to a Slimes story headlined: “President Trump Talked Tough. But His Strike on Syria Was Restrained” on April 14, 2018:

***FLASHBACK / EXCERPT // 4/14/2018 ***

Well, well, well. It appears that the Jew York Slimes is all butt-hurt over the fact that Trump’s missile strikes (as we predicted) didn’t actually do any damage. From the first article:

“In sending missiles and bombs at Syria, President Trump hit more targets and used more firepower than he did in a similar military strike last year. But in the end, he opted for what was still a restrained operation that was evidently calculated to avoid provoking Syria’s patrons in Russia and Iran into retaliating.”

In other words, Trump’s missile show just “shilled” the crap out of the Globo & Zio warmongers! But Syria wasn’t the only place to take incoming missiles the other night. Within minutes of the news, some of “youse guys” launched your own mockery missiles which filled up the inbox of TomatoBubble.com:

Mike, it looks like your theory about Trump and Putin is wrong. — Mike, I love your work, but you’re delusional about Trump. — Mike, you are grasping at straws. — Mike, Q is a bullshit psyop. — Mike, Trump just launched an attack. You should have known better. — Mike, Trump is starting World War III. — Mike, Trump playing 4-D Chess? Hang it up! — Mike, it’s time to publish a retraction, etc. etc. etc.”

Oh well, at least no one cussed us out or cancelled their subscription! (send apologies via contact box down below)

Oh ye beloved TomatoBubblers of little faith! Have we not by now sufficiently established the pattern? Sugar and I, er, “The Editorial Board” of The Anti-New York Times remains firm in the conviction that the pretty fireworks were all just for show. Once again, Trump has neutralized the warmongers, co-opting them as the Russians (his allies) expose the false flag chemical attack.

Notice the pattern:

• Trump “attacks” Syria in 2017 then, weeks later, cuts off funding to the CIA’s “moderate rebels” just as Putin is bombing the crap out of them.
• Trump threatens to nuke North Korea. Now, he will be meeting with Lil’ Kim in June!
• Trump declares “trade war” against China. Then, China removes some of its trade barriers (as Xi and Trump had surely already agreed upon during Trump’s visit to China).
• Trump goes along with Congress’s sanctions on Russia (which he cannot stop, anyway) and bashes Putin. He then announces that he wants to meet with Putin soon.

Trump’s strategy of rhetorical aggressiveness and harmless fireworks enables him to outmaneuver the warmongers — keeping them silent as he pulls the rug out from under them. Be not alarmed by these strategic actions, boys and girls. Trump, Putin, Xi — and by extension, Assad and Lil’ Kim are all on the same team.

1. ANYT / Flashback: 2017: Remember the previous harmless attack on Syria back in April, 2017? 2. Remember the “Rocket Man” insults and the threatening “fire & fury” theatrics? 3. The “Trade War” with China will not last either.

One frustrated reader asked a fair question.

“Mike. What would be your red line which finally causes you to give up on Trump?”

Response: “When Trump takes us to war anywhere in the world, that will be my “red line” — As of now, Assad remains in power, Kim remains in power, and the Iranian government remains in power. Meanwhile, ISIS has been wrecked and Syria remains under Russian and Iranian protection. Keep your eye on the ball, not the head fakes.”

fter all the huffing and puffing and missile attacks, where’s the damage? Trump proclaims “Mission Accomplished” as Assad remains in power, and the Russian-Iranian forces remain in place.

***END OF EXCERPT***

Nailed it.

Trump’s rhetorical ass-kissing of Israel and Bibi Satanyahoo, and symbolic gestures such as moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem; lighting menorahs; donning the beanie cap and touching the fake Wailing Wall; etc, though disgusting to observe, served, by design, the critical purpose of masking the fact that he was never going to give Satanyahoo his long-sought after attack against Iran for the sake of Greater Israel. And certain warmongering elements of the Israeli media itself are now manifesting unmistakable signs of some serious “butt-hurt” over Trump’s looming love affair with Rouhani. Have a look at what some of the Zionist expansionists are saying about this development:

• Haaretz News: Israel Fears Trump Might Sit Down With the Iranians – and Be Outmaneuvered

• Jerusalem Post (Op-Ed): Iran’s Plan to Defeat Donald Trump

• Jerusalem Post: Ehud Barak Warns Against Trump-Rouhani Meeting
• Times of Israel: Barak Calls Potential Trump-Rouhani Talks a ‘Red Light’ for All of Israel
• Times of Israel: Israel Alarmed by Possible Trump-Rouhani Talks
  

• FOX News: Ari Fleischer: Trump Considering Iran Meeting is ‘Unsettling’

Going back to 2018, we find similar ultra-Zionist concerns and butt-hurt about Trump’s policy in Syria:

Times of Israel, April 14, 2018:

• Israel Fears Trump May See Job as Done in Syria, Leave Israel Alone to Face Iran

Oy vey! Why such negativity? The suddenly “alarmed” Israeli ultras can moan and groan all they can about how “unsettling” and “dangerous” Trump’s eventual meeting with Iran may be. But with Russia and Iran, with Trump’s blessing, now playing dominant roles in the region; and with Trump in the early stages of making a deal with Iran; and with Mossad asset Jeffrey Epstein and his pedo-blackmail operation now totally neutralized, the Israelis will have to behave themselves. And now we begin to get a sense of what Q Anon meant when he posted back in March, 2018: “We are saving Israel for last. Very specific reason not mentioned a single time. Q.”

1. Globalists aren’t the only ones applying Butt-Hurt salve these days. Certain ultra-Zionists who trusted Trump to take down Iran have also been outmaneuvered, and are now feeling “unsettled” over it. /// 2. The dead or alive pedo-pervert Epstein was a key Mossad asset; but Trump and the NSA have neutralized him, and now have all of the evidence.The blackmail party is over.

*

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak was photographed trying to cover his face as he visited the New York apartment of his once-valuable asset, Jeffrey Epstein. The worried, whiny bastard is now expressing great frustration with Trump’s outreach to Israeli enemies, North Korea and now, Iran.

From the Jerusalem Post article, August 27, 2019:

“It’s a red light for all of us, which warns against Netanyahu’s over-dependence on President Trump and the sharp turnarounds in Trump’s stances,” Barak said. Barak also used the US-North Korea relations as an example. “In North Korea, we saw war threats that ended in hugs, a dead end in negotiations, hugs again, and then the story repeats itself all over again,” Barak said. “The same could happen with Iran.”

Barak is fed up with Trump’s Charlie Brown routine, and has to be worried about the unraveling of the Epstein child sex / blackmail operation.

From one of The Times of Israel articles listed above (“Israel Alarmed”), quoting another Israel Minister:

“We have no interest in a negotiations between the United States and Iran,” the TV report quoted one minister saying, “but our capacity to influence and confront Trump is extremely limited because Trump has “bear-hugged” Netanyahu so tightly that going out against him is deemed impossible.“

Ya hear that?! Straight from the Hebrew Horse’s own mouth. Trump’s “bear hugging” (public ass-kissing, wearing of matching blue ties etc) of Satanyahoo now makes it “impossible” to condemn Trump as “anti-Israel” or “anti-Semitic” — like (((they))) have always done in the past whenever a U.S. President resists their attempts to “influence and confront.”

So, still believe that Trump a Zionist puppet? Some of “youse guys” really need to rethink that position — because pervert Epstein’s former handler, Ehud Barak, certainly has. And we suspect that some of the websites that are still viciously attacking Trump “from the right” for being a Zionist agent are actually fronts for “the usual suspects” (cough cough) trying to drive a wedge between some of Trump’s America First supporters and him. Ignore the sound of all diversionary sizzle, boys and girls — and judge the steak only.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump and the president might be meeting face-to-face soon.

Boobus Americanus 2: Wow! Trump had seemed so belligerent toward Iran. I would be shocked if that happens.

Source: http://www.tomatobubble.com/id1330.html