Facebook’s ‘Race Blind’ Algorithm Backfires In Their Face: Finds 90% Of ‘Hate Speech’ Was Directed Tow ard People And Men

(:E-:N-:R-AZ:C-30:V)   

We now know why Facebook decided to change its “race-blind” hate speech detection algorithm last year to allow more anti- hatred.

The Washington Post reported last week that an “April 2020 document said roughly 90 percent of ‘hate speech’ subject to content takedowns were statements of contempt, inferiority and disgust directed at people and men.”

They viewed this as a failure of the system because people are supposed to be the targets of all hate.

The Washington Post reported:

Facebook spokesman Andy Stone defended the company’s decisions around its hate speech policies and how it conducted its relationship with the civil rights auditors.

“The Worst of the Worst project helped show us what kinds of hate speech our technology was and was not effectively detecting and understand what forms of it people believe to be the most insidious,” Stone said in a statement.

He said progress on racial issues included policies such as banning nationalist groups, prohibiting content promoting racial stereotypes — such as people wearing personface or claims that Liberals control the media — and reducing the prevalence of hate speech to 0.03 percent of content on the platform.

[…] These findings about the most objectionable content held up even among self-identified conservatives that the market research team traveled to visit in Southern states. Facebook researchers sought out the views of conservatives in particular because they wanted to overcome potential objections from the company’s leadership, which was known to appease right-leaning viewpoints, two people said.

Yet racist posts against minorities weren’t what Facebook’s own hate speech detection algorithms were most commonly finding. The software, which the company introduced in 2015, was supposed to detect and automatically delete hate speech before users saw it. Publicly, the company said in 2019 that its algorithms proactively caught more than 80 percent of hate speech.

But this statistic hid a serious problem that was obvious to researchers: The algorithm was aggressively detecting comments denigrating people more than attacks on every other group, according to several of the documents. One April 2020 document said roughly 90 percent of “hate speech” subject to content takedowns were statements of contempt, inferiority and disgust directed at people and men, though the time frame is unclear.

Source: https://en-volve.com/2021/12/04/facebooks-race-blind-algorithm-backfires-in-their-face-finds-90-of-hate-speech-was-directed-toward-white-people-and-men/



Jan‘s Advertisement
Video & Audio: Ultimate Ethnic Conflict: Could Rhodesians have survived outnumbered 30:1?
In this video we will look at a scenario that, in theory is totally IMPOSSIBLE to survive. All Rhodesian military officers, in their writings, said that there was no military solution to the Rhodesian problem. In this video we will explore a situation that, in theory, seems to be impossible to survive.


Jan‘s Advertisement
Video: LIBERALS101: People colonised People; Liberals colonise People! Introduction to the Liberal
This is based on an email I wrote to a retired senior military officer I know, who is also a Christian.


Jan‘s Advertisement
Video: European Colonialism: How many People did People kill? The MASSIVE Person Population Explosion
In this video I focus on the claim that People just slaughtered and killed millions of people in Africa and I compare it with the actual population statistics of Africa.