France’s GREATEST Author says: Great Replacement is fact: I was very shocked that it was called a theory. It’s not a theory, it’s a fact
White South African Murders page: Murders of Whites from 1996 to 2016
On this page, are collections of the names and details of Whites who were murdered during the period 1996 to 2016. The true number of Whites killed in South Africa since 1994, is stupendous, and nobody has got even a fraction of all the names. But this is the most comprehensive collection that the Boere State Party has currently. My own attorney told me that he thinks 100,000 Whites have been murdered during Black rule.
[I am enjoying how some French intellectuals are standing up. That's EXCELLENT. All Whites may have to rise up and take part in the fight to save Western Civilisation from Jewish destruction. Jan]
Michel Houellebecq has come out and said the Great Replacement, which describes the replacement of European natives with non-Europeans across the West, is a “fact” during a wide-ranging discussion with influential French philosopher Michel Onfray.
“The Great Replacement, I was shocked it’s called a theory. It’s not a theory, it’s a fact,” said Houellebecq. “When it comes to immigration, nobody controls anything, that’s the whole problem. Europe will be swept away by this cataclysm.”
“It’s objectively what the figures say,” added Onfray, who said he thinks that the decline of the West is primarily a demographic decline.
The fact that France’s greatest living writer, as he is often described by the mainstream press, has said the Great Replacement is fact will only add to the growing body of intellectuals, academics, and politicians who have increasingly been willing to describe the Great Replacement in public forums.
Both thinkers also discussed Islam, but had different opinions on its trajectory. Onfray said he believes that Islamism “is not such a powerful phenomenon” but rather “a reaction to American power.” He said that Muslims will eventually line up in the West under the banner of consumerist materialism and cast off their religion, just as many other peoples, such as Europeans, have already done to a large extent.
Houellebecq believes otherwise, saying, “When entire territories are under Islamist control, I think acts of resistance will take place. There will be attacks and shootings in mosques.” He then went on to add that he predicts “reverse Bataclans” — a reference to the Islamists who killed over 100 French people in the Bataclan nightclub in Paris.
“You think the civil war is coming, I think it’s already here, quietly,” Onfray replied.
“All my accumulated experiences make me foresee a dark, and even very dark, future for our children and grandchildren,” said the former director of France’s top intelligence agency in a widely discussed interview
Houellebecq and Onfray, addressed a range of topics, including the European Union, God, immigration, and euthanasia in a 45-page dialogue.
“I want to defend the West, but it must be worth defending,” Houellebecq is quoted as saying in the French magazine Front Populaire, as he describes the contents of his paper co-written with Michel Onfray, warning “lovers of positive psychology and resilient nonsense to go the other way!”
The philosopher and the writer, both convinced of the inevitable decline of the West, discuss in depth the perils that await Europeans, including transhumanism, the Great Replacement, Americanization, European bureaucracy, de-Christianization, ecologism, and the ongoing war in Ukraine — all the subjects that affect our time.
The discussion, turned into an essay, has already won plaudits, being described as an “exceptional dialogue (that) is not depressing, nor even apocalyptic. It is brilliant, profound, often funny, and in every way fascinating. Houellebecq’s genius for the absurd is wonderfully emulsified with Onfray’s rhetorical force,” writes Le Figaro.
Statistics on ethnicity in some Western nations are banned to hide the truth, says acclaimed French author and philosopher Michel Onfray
“Houellebecq and Onfray not only share the accusation of being reactionaries, which the media left often labels them as. They are, each in their own way, the haruspices of our decadence. They examine the entrails of our civilization with frankness and insight. They are also both very different.”
Both authors are also described as being “attached to the people.”
“You are like me. You are a populist!” Onfray says, to which Houellebecq replies: “That’s fine with me. From the right, I have my doubts, but ‘populist suits me.”
Source: https://rmx.news/france/top-french-intellectuals-debate-god-the-eu-euthanasia-and-immigration/
The History Reviewed Bitchute Channel
This is the Bitchute Channel where new HistoryReviewed and AfricanCrisis Videos are also uploaded to